Here is ONE of his palaces.
Posted on 10/03/2002 12:46:25 PM PDT by MadIvan
The UN chief weapons inspector, Hans Blix, has said "loose ends" must be sorted out with Iraq before arms inspections resume.
Mr Blix was speaking after briefing the UN Security Council on his talks with Iraqi officials in Vienna on Tuesday.
"There are minor matters and some loose ends that need to be solved before we go to Baghdad," he said.
The United States and Britain want a robust new UN resolution carrying a clear threat of military action if Iraq fails to meet its obligations.
Mr Blix said the inspectors might delay their return to Iraq pending new instructions from the Security Council .
"It would be awkward if we were doing inspections and a new mandate were to arrive," he said.
He had earlier intended to send some advance teams to Iraq in about two weeks' time.
'Loose ends'
Mr Blix told the Security Council that the outstanding issues concerned
China, France and Russia want to get the inspections started as soon as possible and have resisted the US and British drive for a tough new UN resolution.
Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Alexander Saltanov said on Thursday that Moscow opposed any mention in the draft resolution of the automatic use of force should Iraq fail to comply completely with weapons inspectors.
US draft resolution
But the US draft resolution would give UN inspectors broad new powers to hunt for weapons of mass destruction and provide them with military backing if Iraq obstructed their work.
The United States wants to delay the inspections not just until the new resolution is passed, but for a month beyond that, until Iraq has made a full declaration of all its weapons.
US Secretary of State Colin Powell said "we must find a way forward, if the Security Council will retain its relevance".
But he stressed that "we have to disarm Iraq, and the president is quite willing to do whatever is necessary to bring that about".
Mr Blix is expected to meet US Government officials in Washington on Friday.
Shooting incident
During the briefing a man jumped over a security fence at the UN headquarters and opened fire towards the building. There were no reports of injuries.
Witnesses said the man fired five times, hitting UN headquarters at the 18th and 20th floors, before he put the gun down, scattered some leaflets and waited to be arrested by UN security guards.
'Clear message'
The UK Prime Minister, Tony Blair, told the BBC on Thursday that the existing weapons inspections regime had not been tough enough to get the job done.
"The harder the international community is at the moment, the clearer the message we send, the greater the likelihood there is of avoiding conflict," he said.
Mr Blair insisted that toppling Saddam Hussein was not his aim, but said such a result would be "fantastic... not least for the Iraqi people".
Instead, he said that the aim was to disarm the Iraqi leader of his weapons of mass destruction.
looks like we have to watch the UN more carefully than Saddam these days!
PS: If we vaporize all 57 "palaces" there will be no need to inspect them. Just trying to be helpfil with this suggestion. :O)
Here is ONE of his palaces.
If these inspectors go in by the current rules, they will not find anything. Then, instead of 20,000 lost American lives, it could be 100,000+.
That's the job for the contractors. I can only imagine the planning taking place at Bechtel, Fluor, et al. The first things that have to be fixed include: pumps/pipelines/refineries, hydro/power, streets/sewers/utilities ...
The list goes on. I figure the big NYC banks already have the financing papers in order. All it will take to get the game underway is a joint recognition of governments, including the ability to collateralize the oil assets to back the debt.
I personally know of a couple of people in SoCal who are already getting ready to head over there the day after the shooting stops and the new gov't is in action to set up their import/export business.
Their stupidity?
Figured on that. I can understand why GW did it, but crawling into bed with the anti-US bureacrats at the UN may turn into a big mistake. Soon we'll be hearing about the compromises made by the UN which will enable Saddam to buy time and evade detection. Then when a WMD is detonated in NYC, Wash DC, etc. the rats in the UN will all cry about how horrible it is, while secretly applauding the terrorists.
All three of these seem important to be successful.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.