I would not get too excited about Specter's alleged participation in this -- he has known about Jayna Davis and JD#2 since at least 1995.
This is from the book "The Oklahoma City Bombing and the Politics of Terror", published several years ago.
"Senator Arlen Specter (R-PA) is an avid proponent of the "Terror From Within" theory. During the militia hearings, Specter asked Michigan Militia leader Norm Olson how he could say that he understood how someone could do such a thing (referring to the bombing). Although Specter took Olson's statement out of context, he should probably have asked himself that question. Specter's foregone conclusions obviously derive from a keen sense of intuition. As a young federal prosecutor during the Kennedy assassination, it was Arlen Specter who propounded the single "magic bullet" theory. Now, on the very same day as the bombing, Specter is seen propounding the single "magic bomb" theory on McNeil/Lerher."
"Now Specter, who is head of the Senate Intelligence Committee, is asking KFOR for all the evidence they have collected on John Doe #2. No doubt the good Senator's collecting this information for the next Warren Commission report."
I spent the last hour searching and could not find what I thought I'd read somewhere -- that Specter had wanted to hold hearings into the OKC Bombing but was "talked out of it." Honway, help with this if you can.
I will be very suprised if Specter agrees to go over Jayna's evidence on a live radio show. That's not his style.
Hope I'm wrong, though. Specter, as I've said before, is probably the most enigmatic senator.
For all of you who believe Oliver Stone's depiction of Specter being "crazy" -- he is crazy like a fox.
If he takes up this issue in a serious way now, there is a reason for it. And I will leave it at that.
Posted with hope!
If he takes up this issue in a serious way now, there is a reason for it.
I agee 100% with your assessment. I do not believe Specter would publicize the Middle Eastern connection to the OKC bombing without an OK from the White House. A turning point may have been when Bill Clinton went to England to criticize President Bush. It is possible that the Bush Administration no longer sees protecting the Clinton Administration from public exposure of the cover up as a priority.