At what point was it neccessary for "me" to hit the abuse button? Ugh...nevermind.
"Poor form" is being an effeminate analyst commenting on things you have no insight into or facts at your disposal.
I pinged some people and was harrassed by the nonstarter for having done so. That is where it began...I finished it in short order...unless of course, you would like to take someone's place and continue.
~grin~
And what is funny they both joined FR a long time ago, and hence are using that fact as the basis for their 'wisdom' .....in that they are some sort of FR veterans or something (one tried to tell me how he partook in the Clinton Impeachment debate on FR). To that my answer is: so bloody what! Of all the answers i got theirs were the most asinine since instead of answering questions they are telling me about their lil' debates on FR years ago.
And as for their 'warwounds' and time on FR i think that is the most hilarious facet about them. The majority of freepers (actually all) who answered me comprehensively were relative newbies, yet these two guys had been on FR for years and could not even compose a cohesive sentence without trying to impart useless info like how long they have been debating on Clinton's impeachment. Let me say if they are spokespeople for 'time spent on FR equals wisdom' they seriously failed since of all the replies theirs was not onyl acerbic but asinine. Hence in this particualr case i would say age on FR may equal experience, but definitely not wisdom or the ability to answer a question and stick to the parameters.
Ay caramba, i think some folks just go picking fights for no use VaB.
And although i am not afraid of getting into heated debate i am not going to waste my time with such folk over a thread topic that is still up in the air. Once i know the facts then tha is another story, but as far as i am concerned this is a thread that seems to have something in it (for example there is some sort of coverup), but the what is still an unknown factor. for all intents and purposes this is very similar to the Kennedy assasination brouhaha in that there seems to be a kernel of doubt with circumstancial evidence and witnesses, but as of yet no official word saying something did happen. This is not to say the Iraqis were not connected with OKC (chances are they might actually have played a hand) ....however i refuse to engage in silly jousting with Freepers who think their age on FR somehow makes them supreme sages or something like that (and yet the way they answer shows otherwise).
When it comes to argumentative debate I would rather stick to familiar territory eg Sukhois (lol).