Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

LAUGH BREAK Pantless lawyer quits post (in court in flagrante delicto)
DAILY NEWS ^ | 10/3/02 | MIKE CLAFFEY

Posted on 10/03/2002 5:09:28 AM PDT by Liz

A U.S. bankruptcy official allegedly caught with his pants down in a Brooklyn courtroom has voluntarily resigned rather than go through with a public airing of his case, the Daily News has learned.

Lawyer Stuart Gelberg, a court trustee who supervised bankruptcy cases, will be allowed to complete his caseload, according to Jane Limprecht, a spokesman for the Justice Department's U.S. Trustee program.

Gelberg, 46, was caught in a compromising position with a woman in February, according to a formal complaint filed by lawyer Gus Farinella.

Farinella said he was "shocked and outraged" by the incident and called Gelberg's conduct in the vacant courtroom "disgusting and inappropriate."

He was scheduled to testify at a disciplinary hearing in August, but the hearing was abruptly canceled, according to Farinella's lawyer, Mel Sachs.

Limprecht declined to comment on Farinella's charges or whether they played a role in Gelberg's resignation from the post he has held since 1983.

Gelberg's salary of $148,368, which is higher than that of a federal judge, is based on the size of his caseload. Court officials said his pay will decline as his caseload does.

Gelberg did not return a call for comment. Previously, he told The News that Farinella was motivated by "personal animus" against him.

Farinella, a bankruptcy lawyer who had represented clients before Gelberg, denied that charge.

Sachs said Farinella was simply acting in keeping "with the highest ethical standards expected of a member of the bar."


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; Political Humor/Cartoons
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last
No public airing of the matter? What about the public's right to know. We oughta sue.
1 posted on 10/03/2002 5:09:28 AM PDT by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Liz
Sue? The dem's will want to run him for president.
2 posted on 10/03/2002 5:13:20 AM PDT by Jaxter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liz
Geeez.....who forgot the law that lawyers are not allowed to breed......

The should be nuetered when the pass the Bar Exam......

Gotta keep the herd under control ya'know...

NeverGore
3 posted on 10/03/2002 5:14:11 AM PDT by nevergore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nevergore
A lawyer screwing someone in the courtroom, imagine that.
4 posted on 10/03/2002 5:17:36 AM PDT by ChadsDad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Liz
What's the problem?

Sure beats trying that game in a church...

5 posted on 10/03/2002 5:17:46 AM PDT by Publius6961
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liz
Lawyer Stuart Gelberg de facto and ex propio motu is alledged that locus delicti was the Court Room. Prima facie
sugests that Gelberg maxim sic utere tuo ut alienum non laedas. Therefore prima facie nullum crimen sine lege, nulla poena sine lege. Ipso facto the female is a amicus curiae and may have previous in camera actions.
6 posted on 10/03/2002 5:31:56 AM PDT by Lockbox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liz
At least the guy didn't have the same last name as the spokesperson, Jane Limprecht.
7 posted on 10/03/2002 5:42:26 AM PDT by mywholebodyisaweapon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liz
It has nothing to do with his public life - (sarcasm) Besides - she was only an intern (ahem)

Now if he used it (the courtroom) as a toilet, and took black and white pictures the NEA would have financed it and the judge would have protected it as free speech
8 posted on 10/03/2002 6:03:21 AM PDT by Revelation 911
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jaxter
or in the least AG - he seems to have a knack for probing
9 posted on 10/03/2002 6:04:28 AM PDT by Revelation 911
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Publius6961
whats the difference between a lawyer and roadkill - ?

there are skidmarks in front of the roadkill
10 posted on 10/03/2002 6:05:54 AM PDT by Revelation 911
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

TAKE BACK THE SENATE!

VOTE OUT THE DEMS!

DONATE TODAY!!!.
SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC

Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com
Become A Monthly Donor
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD

11 posted on 10/03/2002 6:08:10 AM PDT by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: xsmommy; dubyaismypresident; hobbes1; RikaStrom; Robert A. Cook, PE; one_particular_harbour
Anyone seen OPH lately? lol
12 posted on 10/03/2002 6:13:05 AM PDT by WhyisaTexasgirlinPA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liz
Perhaps the problem is that the man was caught with a woman. This is too un-pc. If it was a man caught with a man then the bar would not have been upset. I probably would have praise the choice.

these circumstances are too full of personal animus. The lawyer who reported this, gus, really needs to have an investigation as to his reason for reporting this. This did not affect clients, court was not in session, while inappropriate to use an empty deserted room in a public building for entertaining, this lawyer must really be an a-hole to report such a trial act.
13 posted on 10/03/2002 6:16:11 AM PDT by Greeklawyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Greeklawyer
correction above.

change I to the bar

The bar probably would have praised the choice.
14 posted on 10/03/2002 6:17:45 AM PDT by Greeklawyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Liz

15 posted on 10/03/2002 6:19:50 AM PDT by TheRedSoxWinThePennant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WhyisaTexasgirlinPA
Anyone seen OPH lately? lol

ROTFLMAO!

16 posted on 10/03/2002 6:22:27 AM PDT by NeoCaveman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Liz
Was that a public airing, or a pubic airing ? Was the complaint lodged because he was having sex with a (gasp!) woman ??

Inquiring minds want to know... each and every breath-taking detail !

17 posted on 10/03/2002 6:23:29 AM PDT by genefromjersey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Publius6961
Sooner shall a camel pass thru the eye of a needle than a lawyer, judge, or politician pass thru the gates of Heaven...
18 posted on 10/03/2002 6:57:39 AM PDT by Marobe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Jaxter
Yup, but hope he knows what to do with a cigar.
19 posted on 10/03/2002 7:04:50 AM PDT by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: genefromjersey
Now, now. You won't get any of the Vagina Monologues here (blush).
20 posted on 10/03/2002 7:05:52 AM PDT by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson