To: hchutch
OMG!!! Now she's saying why is the difference of a few days between 51 and now???? For the love of GOD! It's the LAW!!!!!! I'm going to have a heart attack.
To: rintense
I'll have a cardiac with you. This hearing is only a formality. You'd think the Court would at least go through the motions of appearing less biased.
To: rintense
Yeah, but time for the people to hear it this way:
"If a business did this, it would be shut down, and the owners would be very lucky to avoid an 8-foot by 10-foot prison cell with a cellmate who says, 'My name is Spike, honey.'"
This is a tactic that reeks of one of the sleaziest examples of corporate misconduct - deceptive "bait and switch" campaigning.
607 posted on
10/02/2002 8:46:06 AM PDT by
hchutch
To: rintense
Now she's saying why is the difference of a few days between 51 and now???? For the love of GOD! It's the LAW!!!!!! She keeps harping on the number of days and keeps saying if Torricelli had made his decision earlier it would have been OK so why not now?
This is exactly like Florida when the SCOFLA wanted to disregard deadlines!
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson