[gridlock]

If the court wants to fashion the least intrusive and disruptive remedy, it must disallow Torricelli's request to be removed from the ballot. That will mean that everybody has what he had last Sunday, an opportunity to vote for Torricelli, Forrester, or any of the minor candidates.

Just because Torricelli is losing is no reason to change the ballot. When somebody says he's going to do something and works at it for two years, I have no problem holding him to the deal.

[1Old Pro]

Justices upset with GOP guy because they have already ruled and are now just trying to make it doable.

GOP guy says they are jumping the gun and they should FOLLOW THE LAW.

[rintense]

But the court is missing this! They keep pulling the 'voter' rights crap. There is no doubt in my mind that the decision has already been made, thanks in part to behind-the-scenes politics from Clinton, McAwfull, and the DNC. This is a disgrace to the American election process and the Constitution.