[Howlin]

I have that knot in my stomach again; this is going to the Supreme Court and we're gonna hear "The Republicans don't want people to vote" all over again.

[rintense]

There is a fund issue...

[TonyInOhio]

Lawyer for Clerks says still time to "do over", money not available. A justice says "assuming money is not an issue". Now he wants to know how much they might need!!! :-(

[RedBloodedAmerican]

The Republicans aren't the ones who are trying to replace a LOSER. Dems pushed out a Dem. This is great. They are all hanging themselves. Gore, Dasshole, McAuliffe....very nice indeed. I can't wait until 2004. The only chance Dems have is if they shut their pieholes for 2 years, and there is no way they can do that.

[MamaLucci]

Only this time, the GOP seems to be shell shocked rather than engaged for battle.

[dead]

This is going to wind up in the US SC next week, based on the fact that the 17th amendment mandates how the election of Senators is conducted, and the "equal protection" prohibits states from denying any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

Absentee voters, including the military, are going to be screwed if the NJ SC arbitrarily waves a standing election law, and the US SC (probably by a 7-2 vote) will not let that stand.

And Republicans are evil because they won't let the Democrats change any law that bothers them.

[dhfnc]

A guess this is the new Democratic policy. If the candidate is behind in the polls in the last month, replace him!

This is the same as the Florida voting mess - It you don't win - Ask for a recount, and another recount and then if you have not won, scream "Not all the votes were counted". Now they have a new one - "replace candidate if not winning in the polls".