To: XJarhead
The current question of ths statute that provides for filling a vacancy within 30 days implies another statute would allow an election within 30 days. Therefore NJ has one statute requiring an election within 30 days and another statute that limits it to 51 days. It implies that 30 days is previously recognized as adequate time to conduct an election.
To: VRWC_minion
Judge - What happens if the Torch remains on the ballot?
Judge - What happens if the Torch wins?
RAT - Elected someone who cannot serve.
Judge - How about the Missouri case? (ouch)
Judge - Torch on the ballot = a vote for the dem party?
To: VRWC_minion
The rat: "people vote for a candidate, not the party" when referencing what would happen if T was left on the ballot said that the party could NOT replace him if he won the election! Deep sixed himself on this one.
251 posted on
10/02/2002 8:02:09 AM PDT by
cinFLA
To: VRWC_minion
The current question of ths statute that provides for filling a vacancy within 30 days implies another statute would allow an election within 30 days. Therefore NJ has one statute requiring an election within 30 days and another statute that limits it to 51 days. It implies that 30 days is previously recognized as adequate time to conduct an election.Wasn't that 51 days statute added in order to conform to some FEDERAL law?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson