Skip to comments.
NJ Supreme Court Hearing Live Thread
New Jersey Public TV ^
| 10/02/02
| TonyInOhio
Posted on 10/02/2002 7:04:20 AM PDT by TonyInOhio
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 1,281-1,293 next last
To: twigs; Lion's Cub
As long as they wait until they are into the 60 day period before the elections Don't forget, it's always 60 days before some election. One of the people working on the CFR suit pointed that out to me.
61
posted on
10/02/2002 7:31:46 AM PDT
by
nina0113
To: Lion's Cub
Great observation about the connection to CFR!
To: tomkat
63
posted on
10/02/2002 7:31:59 AM PDT
by
killjoy
To: piasa
Justice (Nero?) asks that since Rats are asking for equitable relief, shouldn't the Court look at why Candidate is withdrawing? (Implying Torch had no good reason to withdraw).
To: Fred Mertz
C-SPAN I is covering somewhat as House proceedings allow..
To: piasa
Right now it looks like the court is asking all the correct questions.
To: TonyInOhio
q- Future "parade of horribles" as candidates are removed at whim, if we do it your way.
a- if you can fix it, fix it.
q- how do we exclude the use of this ruse (my word) simply for candidates who are LOSING
a- Judges shouldn't consider the cause of a vacancy!!!
q- B.S. (my word) we judges consider such factors all the time
67
posted on
10/02/2002 7:32:34 AM PDT
by
Stultis
To: Ragtime Cowgirl; tomkat
To: Molly Pitcher; hobbes1
Thank you so much, Molly. I couldn't access the other link (NJN).
69
posted on
10/02/2002 7:32:56 AM PDT
by
ELS
To: mwl1
I would say that several are asking questions, but it seems more like they want help in figuring out how to answer Republican objections and decide for the demonRATS.
Comment #71 Removed by Moderator
To: ELS
LOL. Yes its CSPAN 3 in the Bldg... ; )
72
posted on
10/02/2002 7:34:13 AM PDT
by
hobbes1
To: Oldeconomybuyer
I hope you are right, but doesn't it always look that way? The judges ask the tough questions which gives the lawyer a chance to present their argument. Example: Judge says, Why should we let you override the law, which clearly states the deadline? Lawyer says Because we really really want to. Judge says to self, Hmmm, I agree. Looks like the lawyer got hammered, but he didn't.
73
posted on
10/02/2002 7:34:23 AM PDT
by
Huck
To: Oldeconomybuyer
A right to a competitive election? I guess McConnell has to be removed from the ballot here in Kentucky, then, since he's way ahead of a weak Democrat opponent. Ridiculous.
To: freedomcrusader
"IF you can fix it, fix it." "Whoops your honor, what I really meant to say....."
To: Stultis
great stuff. thanks
76
posted on
10/02/2002 7:35:21 AM PDT
by
mwl1
To: ELS
you're welcome. C-SPAN III is the most reliable if you have that....
To: Molly Pitcher
C-SPAN III is carrying this also! Looks like CNN, too. It just started. (Don't have CSPAN III. Had to serf.) I hope this is on CNN, because it's important.I'd hate to miss it.
To: killjoy
got it on cspam online, thanks !
btw, is it just me, or does this 'rat lawyer sound like the 'guy' everyone loved givin' wedgies to ?
79
posted on
10/02/2002 7:35:44 AM PDT
by
tomkat
To: mwl1
She just made the point that he withdrew for losing.
80
posted on
10/02/2002 7:35:52 AM PDT
by
hobbes1
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 1,281-1,293 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson