Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SternTrek
"The answer to this is so simple, i don't know why any of these bozos haven't proposed it yet. Torrecelli's name stays on the ballot, if he wins he promises to resign the seat and McGreevy appoints Lautenberg. "

That's what all this is about. Torricelli would not win, so...they have to circumvent or change the law.

What-ever Democrats want becomes the law.

13 posted on 10/02/2002 5:11:44 AM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: blam
I know, but this is how the court should rule. As Jeff Goldblaum said in Independence Day..., "TIMES UP!"
15 posted on 10/02/2002 5:14:09 AM PDT by SternTrek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: blam
"The answer to this is so simple, i don't know why any of these bozos haven't proposed it yet. Torrecelli's name stays on the ballot, if he wins he promises to resign the seat and McGreevy appoints Lautenberg. "

That proposition was in the NRO article Rush cited yesterday.

58 posted on 10/02/2002 5:54:46 AM PDT by randita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: blam
And now Rush is talking about a Dem idea floating around to move the election to November *2003*?!

Time to get out the loafers again, folks. Have fun storming the castle!

153 posted on 10/02/2002 9:40:12 AM PDT by bootless
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson