To: Northeast
Let me rephrase their position.
The Democrats bought this seat, it is their seat, been their seat, should remain their seat.
It is their Senate, they owned it for years, they "won" it back, should remain their Senate.
The voters selected Torricelli. Unfortunately he had to withdraw. He can't allow an unfit person to be in office, so he and his liberal buddies are totally justified in making sure that they keep this seat. Whatever has to be done to keep it, as long as it is a Democrat holding it,is legal, ethical, appropriate, and even if it isn't it will be fine because Democrat liberals are born to rule.
(/sarcasm off)
23 posted on
10/01/2002 10:31:31 AM PDT by
IVote2
To: IVote2
Darn tootin IVote! Why, the Dems are
entitled to that seat, it's just not
faaaair! /whine.
Regards
To: IVote2
You forgot to add:
"The Democratic candidate owns 96% of the black votes, 81% of the Jewish votes, 69% of the Hispanic votes, 100% of the illegal alien votes (oops!). Any election result that does not have all of these votes for the Democratic candidate is "flawed", has failed to "count every vote", and cannot stand up against the will of the people".
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson