Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

(Madelyne) Toogood reportedly fled Memphis doctor's office without paying bill
The Commercial Appeal ^ | 10/1/02 | Clay Bailey

Posted on 10/01/2002 6:34:33 AM PDT by GailA

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last
To: GailA
"A woman, identified as Toogood, came into Dellinger's office on March 25, 1997 with three boys - listed as Henry, Shawn and
John - seeking treatment for "common infections," Dellinger said Monday."

I thought I read that she only had 2 other children besides Martha. How many kids does really have?
21 posted on 10/01/2002 10:28:15 AM PDT by Oregon W.oman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GailA
Dellinger is part of the Pedicatric and Adolescent Medicine of East Memphis office at 6248 Poplar, just east of Ridgeway.

Isn't that a long way down Poplar to be considered in Memphis? Or is it just on the wrong side of the street?

22 posted on 10/01/2002 10:37:35 AM PDT by gov_bean_ counter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
Toogood "shoplifted" the doctor's services. His employees could have detained her until the police arrived.

But you can't "shoplift" services, can you now?

And -- if frogs had wings, they wouldn't bump their little green asses on the ground.

23 posted on 10/01/2002 10:46:01 AM PDT by WL-law
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Oh, E. Pluribus Unut.

While you are free to continue to try and cover up the Scam artists who rip off old ladies, I must inform you that the only time these eyes rest upon the N.I. is when there is a too long line at the grocery.

Unlike you, I am not constrained by my continued Crook Awareness to ignore larger problems. Though there a few problems facing this nation greater than control of the criminal elements. Elements which are routinely protected, defended, justified by Liberals every chance they get. Now its the "poor, innocent, misunderstood Travelers." Barf.
24 posted on 10/01/2002 10:47:50 AM PDT by justshutupandtakeit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum; justshutupandtakeit; Orual; aculeus; general_re
You're just embarrassed by the fact that you are more interested in tabloid inanities than anything of actual importance.

Don't forget to pick up the National Enquirer when you stop by the convenience store for cigarettes and beer.

Oddly enough, E. Pluribus Unum, people will discuss topics of THEIR choice without consulting YOU.

25 posted on 10/01/2002 10:55:42 AM PDT by dighton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: WL-law
But you can't "shoplift" services, can you now?

If payment is demanded upon completion of services, do you doubt that the nurses could have held this gypsy until the police arrived?

I don't know that the police could have done much, except scare the absolute hell out of her, which their mere presence would have done. Cops to gypsies are like crosses to a vampire.

26 posted on 10/01/2002 10:58:35 AM PDT by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: GailA
When it rains, it pours.
27 posted on 10/01/2002 11:02:50 AM PDT by hoosierskypilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hoosierskypilot
Amazing, isn't it? Get caught smacking your kid around on ONE security camera, and all the folks you ever ripped off over the years just feel like piling on! It ain't fair, I'm tellin' ya! :o)
28 posted on 10/01/2002 11:04:25 AM PDT by Poohbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: WL-law
Shoplift services??
You can if you run fast enuff!
29 posted on 10/01/2002 11:05:09 AM PDT by Minutemen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: GailA
Nothing to see here folks, just your average white trailer trash.
30 posted on 10/01/2002 11:06:27 AM PDT by Minutemen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
If payment is demanded upon completion of services, do you doubt that the nurses could have held this gypsy until the police arrived?

By doing so they would expose themselves to a tort action for false imprisonment --- not too smart and I wouldn't recommend.

Holding a shoplifter when you have physical evidence that they left the store without paying is another matter, because then its clear that the criminal had no intention of paying for the goods, the Corpus delecti of a crime is present, so the imprisonment is legal under notions of citizen arrest.

In the doctor's office example, however, MOST PEOPLE either pay by insurance or by check after invoice by mail, notwithstanding what any sign says in the doctor's office. So it follows that someone who leaves the office without paying is not demoinstrating clear corpus delecti of a crime. Therefore to hold them is, arguably, a false imprisonment,

31 posted on 10/01/2002 11:35:40 AM PDT by WL-law
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: dighton
Oddly enough, E. Pluribus Unum, people will discuss topics of THEIR choice without consulting YOU.

They shouldn't.

32 posted on 10/01/2002 12:20:09 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit
Now its the "poor, innocent, misunderstood Travelers."

No it ain't. It's victims of horrendous crimes who are ignored. The little crimes with faces of people you are itching to hate are the ones you are most interested in. Forget the politically-correct mass murders. Hand me my Enquirer.

33 posted on 10/01/2002 12:22:36 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
Would you be as concerned if five black people had gotten shot at the bank?

We would be concerned about NOTHING else.

34 posted on 10/01/2002 12:23:26 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
Would you be as concerned if five black people had gotten shot at the bank?

Correction. The media would be concerned about NOTHING else.

35 posted on 10/01/2002 12:24:11 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: lsee
Maybe she used to have three.
36 posted on 10/01/2002 3:04:29 PM PDT by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: GovernmentShrinker
OUCH! Hadn't thought of that! I figured it was a relative's child.
37 posted on 10/01/2002 3:12:01 PM PDT by lsee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: lsee
You probably figured right, but you just never know with this lady.
38 posted on 10/01/2002 3:19:50 PM PDT by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson