[Timesink]

McGreevey could appoint subject to a special election to be held between November 5 and the date when the new Senate is sworn in. That way the term is not extended, because the Torch's seat ends on the date of the swearing in, just as it would have without the special election.

I don't understand. If McGreevey appoints someone AND calls a special election, and the guy wins, what's the problem? I'm talking about the RATS trying to avoid an election altogether.

[gridlock]

If McGreevey appoints someone AND calls a special election, and the guy wins, what's the problem?

The problem is, the 'Rats nominated Torricelli, and now they should be stuck with him. Otherwise they get at least two swings at every ball. If they're losing, just line up another candidate and see if he does better. Meanwhile, the honorable Republican has spent his time campaigning against one candidate, only to be faced with another.

The problem is that it is sneaky, underhanded and unfair. Not to mention the fact that it disenfranchises all of those 'Rat primary voters. (Not that I spend a lot of time worrying about 'Rats, mind you)

[swheats]

I know this could be wishful thinking but in light of all the speculations, could McGreevey be an honest broker and do the right thing in spite of the DNC?

Ok I know I'm talking bout a RAT but it could happen right?