Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dianna
Except that that was a primary election, not the general election. The Senate rules said that the winning candidate of the general election had to be a resident of the state, and the dead aren't residents. Carnahan should have been disqualified, unless the courts wanted to extrapolate from one ruling to another. I can see creating a vacancy with intent for the primary, but not the real thing. Voters would be giving up their constitutional right to elect Senators if they intentionally created a vacancy to be filled by the governor.

-PJ

1,693 posted on 09/30/2002 4:02:08 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1673 | View Replies ]


To: Political Junkie Too
The Senate rules said that the winning candidate of the general election had to be a resident of the state, and the dead aren't residents. Carnahan should have been disqualified, unless the courts wanted to extrapolate from one ruling to another. I can see creating a vacancy with intent for the primary, but not the real thing. Voters would be giving up their constitutional right to elect Senators if they intentionally created a vacancy to be filled by the governor.

Thanks for clearing this up for me.

1,711 posted on 09/30/2002 4:04:34 PM PDT by Dianna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1693 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson