Sounds like my kind of class :)
assemble in a classroom equipped with an overhead projector for a three-hour class that Newman, 59, said was grounded in sociology, psychology, history and linguistics.
...and no economics? I would think you have to include economics when discussing wealth, and its relationship to power...
Some students familiar with Newman's teaching said they were drawn to the class partly because they view her as liberal and opinionated.
Ah, that explains it. It's much easier to convince students that the wealthy are evil (and also to justify wealth redistribution) when their success is explained in terms of "privilege" or "luck".
But to be fair, I should point out that an opinionated liberal such as Ms. Newman probably has only a faint, distorted understanding of the simplest economic precepts.