Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SBeck
First of all, there is absolutely no evidence that it would work. Let's not be naive, the NY Times is supporting this because they love abortion. And they are using Nancy Reagan's name to revive the issue bacause they hope to split conservatives.

Second, it's immoral to kill one person to save another. Even if it did work. It's basic Nazi medicine.

Next thing we'll be told that unborn babies would make nice lamp shades, and it's a pity to let them go to waste.
11 posted on 09/28/2002 5:35:27 PM PDT by Cicero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Cicero
"Let's not be naive, the NY Times is supporting this because they love abortion. And they are using Nancy Reagan's name to revive the issue bacause they hope to split conservatives."

Nancy was pro-abortion before her husband became ill, so this is just another excuse to celebrate her "wisdom" on this issue.

All in all, it's very disheartening to know that Betty Ford, Nancy Reagan, Barbara Bush and Laura Bush are all pro-abortion rights. I'm sure the other three would have no problem lining up with Nancy on this too.

23 posted on 09/28/2002 6:41:04 PM PDT by Artist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson