If the story I heard on MSNBC is accurate, I see absolutely no reason for the Toogood family to take pictures of the child's genitals. None.To play devil's advocate, since they are being accused of abuse, might they not want to have some evidence that they did not sexually abuse the child should that charge be leveled later on? Also, since the state was taking custody of the child, might they not want proof that they did not abuse the child should the child, God forbid, be abused while in state custody?
You've made an excellent point, PBRSTREETGANG. I honestly didn't think about that. I guess I am naive to a certain extent. I look at a four-year-old as a baby and that would not cross my mind if I was in her shoes. Maybe the lawyers had them do it.