Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: WhiteGuy
Now, are you sure we couldn't squeeze in just a little free beer?

For Mr. Watson to be consistent, yes, free beer would have to be provided to alcoholics. And free cigarettes to smokers.

7 posted on 09/25/2002 11:39:01 AM PDT by Phantom Lord
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: Phantom Lord
What about us red-meat-aholics? We need our porterhouse fix too! Hey I think I found an issue to run for office on.

"My fellow Americans, make no mistake about it. If I'm elected you will have free porterhouse steaks for life. I guaran-dam-tee it."

10 posted on 09/25/2002 11:45:22 AM PDT by winner45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Phantom Lord
Incorrect. See objection #5:

5. Why not free beer?

The difference between booze and drugs is the fact we don’t have a widespread illegal trade in alcoholic beverages that is fueling crime (unlike during the Prohibition).

My primary interest is crime reduction. For this, we must target the source of this crime. Cost reduction to government agencies is only secondary. If the current drug cartels switched to alcoholic beverages, they will have to compete against established producers - odds are they won't be able to compete - hence no need for free booze (sorry guys).

19 posted on 09/25/2002 12:00:32 PM PDT by Edward Watson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Phantom Lord
Beer and cigarettes kick ass!!!!
20 posted on 09/25/2002 12:01:30 PM PDT by WhiteGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson