Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Chinese PM Warns of Consequeces if US Attacks Iraq
Radio Netherlands ^ | September 22 2002

Posted on 09/24/2002 3:56:14 PM PDT by knighthawk

Chinese Prime Minister Zhu Rongji says an attack on Iraq without a United Nations mandate will lead to 'severe consequences.' The Prime Minister also said there had to be hard evidence that Iraq is producing weapons of mass destruction. The Chinese Prime Minister's comments were made shortly after British Prime Minister Tony Blair revealed a secret dossier which states that Iraq can launch an offensive using chemical or biological weapons within 45 minutes.

The dossier has brought mixed reactions; some experts say it reveals nothing new, while others see it as overwhelming evidence that Iraq is producing chemical and biological weapons.

According to Baghdad, the claims made in the document are entirely baseless.

The British parliament returned from recess today (Tuesday) to discuss the Iraq question.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: chenese; china; iraq; usattack
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

1 posted on 09/24/2002 3:56:15 PM PDT by knighthawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MizSterious; rebdov; Nix 2; green lantern; BeOSUser; Brad's Gramma; dreadme; keri; Turk2; ...
Ping
2 posted on 09/24/2002 3:56:45 PM PDT by knighthawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
Why should Zhu Rongji be any more relevant than Al Gore?
3 posted on 09/24/2002 3:59:57 PM PDT by Argus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
Unfortunate. But there's not much we can do about it aside from being firmly polite. I don't think their strategic interests are threatened nearly as much as they were when we went into Central Asia.
4 posted on 09/24/2002 4:00:37 PM PDT by Cicero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
From this we can assume China would veto such a resolution at the UN. An option for Bush would be to simply announce that the U.S. intends to enforce EXISTING UN resolution in order to prevent he UN from becoming irrelevant.
5 posted on 09/24/2002 4:03:06 PM PDT by Ranger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
Chinese Prime Minister Zhu Rongji says an attack on Iraq without a United Nations mandate will lead to 'severe consequences.'

Name them, Zhu. Put up or shut up.

6 posted on 09/24/2002 4:03:15 PM PDT by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
There will be "severe consequences". A lot of "severe" stuff will happen. Severe stuff may even happen to us. Severe stuff may even happen to them.
7 posted on 09/24/2002 4:04:05 PM PDT by HaveGunWillTravel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
KEYWORDS: CHENESE

Is that the language spokem by the Vice President?

8 posted on 09/24/2002 4:05:27 PM PDT by Izzy Dunne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
Okay, put China in the "against us" column and get on with it.
9 posted on 09/24/2002 4:05:56 PM PDT by AdA$tra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
Okay, put China in the "against us" column and get on with it.
10 posted on 09/24/2002 4:05:57 PM PDT by AdA$tra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
It is our intention that it have "severe consequences." I think the Chinese know and fear that.
11 posted on 09/24/2002 4:06:01 PM PDT by Williams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
Chinese Prime Minister Zhu Rongji

F.U.! Love ,cmsgop
12 posted on 09/24/2002 4:06:22 PM PDT by cmsgop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
some experts say it reveals nothing new, while others see it as overwhelming evidence that Iraq is producing chemical and biological weapons.

You know, it's just possible that BOTH points are true!

13 posted on 09/24/2002 4:07:40 PM PDT by Izzy Dunne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ranger
Hold on .....not so fast about the Chinese veto.

This is their way of telling us that the price for them to abstain just went up.

14 posted on 09/24/2002 4:07:56 PM PDT by Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: AdA$tra
Adastra...

No, put China on the list with their democrat enablers. Gore, Daschle etc. Birds of a feather.

15 posted on 09/24/2002 4:08:39 PM PDT by cynicom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Dog
What do you think they want?
16 posted on 09/24/2002 4:09:15 PM PDT by Ranger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
"...Chinese Prime Minister Zhu Rongji says an attack on Iraq without a United Nations mandate will lead to 'severe consequences.'..."

LOL!

Shut up rub-a-dub...

And make damn sure that you get extra starch in the dress shirts this time.

17 posted on 09/24/2002 4:09:33 PM PDT by DWSUWF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne
The rest of the world views America as a bully. China is standing up to this bully. Don't meddle in the affairs of others if it doesn't concern you. And also good job in vietnam. Truth be told, you don't have any evidence. Presidents, either share it w/ the public or stop pushing for war. Nobody wants war. The most that China's going to do is send technology to Iraq. Perhaps other countries as well. More likely it will veto American bills that come up in the security council. Provide some "hard evidence" or go it alone.
18 posted on 09/24/2002 4:09:53 PM PDT by Seeker204
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Ranger
From this we can assume China would veto such a resolution at the UN

Possible, but it depends on how the resolution is worded.

19 posted on 09/24/2002 4:10:10 PM PDT by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Dog
$18 per BBL of oil for the next 10 years might be an interesting inducement with China being guaranteed supplies from the Occupied Iraq Oil Administrative Trust?
20 posted on 09/24/2002 4:11:11 PM PDT by Ranger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson