Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
There was a withholding of 696 MMcf/d. 696/7000 is 9.9%. I'd consder that significant in a very tight market. (The 210 MMcf/d that was witheld was just the portion due to running the pipeline below MAOP, other causes make up for the other 486 MMcf/d).

California officials said the firm's price manipulation cost consumers $3.7 billion.
I wonder how they arrived at that number.
38 posted on 09/24/2002 7:57:50 PM PDT by Looking for Diogenes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]


To: Looking for Diogenes
I wonder what the nationwide figure would be.

"The body that passes government", (california) exponentially raised prices for us all in 2000.

39 posted on 09/24/2002 8:23:14 PM PDT by justrepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

To: Looking for Diogenes
I wonder how they arrived at that number.

Me too. In another article [not posted] on the subject, it was estimated that El Paso trading division made "over one hundred million" dollars on this so-called "scam".

My guess is that California made up the $3 billion figure just like they did the $9 billion that the "energy pirates" owed them: because it sounded good in press releases.

43 posted on 09/25/2002 4:48:05 AM PDT by snopercod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson