Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Harkin camp admits leaking Ganske transcript
Des Moines Register ^ | 9-24-02 | By JONATHAN ROOS

Posted on 09/24/2002 5:29:11 AM PDT by Iowa Granny

U.S. Sen. Tom Harkin's campaign manager admitted Monday night that the campaign had obtained a transcript of a secretly taped meeting of Greg Ganske and his supporters, then passed it along to a journalist.

"We made a mistake, and we're sorry," said Jeff Link, who previously had denied knowing where the journalist, Kathie Obradovich, had gotten the transcript.

"We take full responsibility for releasing it to the press," Link said.

He said a "junior staffer," whom he would not identify, had obtained the material from a person who was promised confidentiality by the staffer.

The revelations capped a day of complaints about skulduggery in the U.S. Senate race pitting Harkin, the Democratic incumbent, against Ganske, a Republican congressman.

Iowa GOP leaders said that despite Link's apology, they intended to proceed with their written request Monday that state and federal authorities investigate to determine whether the taping violated any laws.

"We will continue to pursue legal remedies," said Ganske campaign spokesman Ann Warren. "This is just the tip of the iceberg."

Obradovich said in a newspaper column that she had obtained a recording of the Sept. 3 meeting from "Democratic sources." Party leaders initially disavowed any knowledge of the taping, which has created a national stir. CNN and the New York Times reported on the electronic snooping charges, along with the Drudge Report and other Internet news outlets.

State Republican Chairman Charles Larson Jr. and William Armistead, Ganske's campaign manager, requested the criminal probe. They asked both Darwin Chapman, director of the Iowa Division of Criminal Investigation, and Steve Colloton, U.S. attorney for the state's Southern District, to mount investigations. Authorities said they would review that request.

"Clearly, a very serious breach of privacy has occurred," Larson said at a Statehouse news conference. "Without doubt, someone was either wearing a wire (microphone) in the room, or the room had been bugged. There's no other way that kind of information could have been leaked outside of the room."

Link said Monday night that he didn't know who taped the meeting or how it was done, but he said it was ludicrous of Republicans to suggest that the meeting room had been bugged.

"My guess is somebody in that room recorded it. My guess is it was somebody invited to the meeting," he said.

About 24 people attended the meeting, described as a campaign update for some of Ganske's Des Moines-area donors, at the Hotel Savery. The participants included former Iowa Gov. Robert Ray and Ken Mehlman, White House political director, who took part in the meeting by telephone.

Ray said "it wasn't on anyone's mind" that someone might be secretly taping the meeting. "It's illegal, and it's stooping to a new low."

Democrats previously had suggested that a disgruntled Republican or the Ganske campaign itself could have been the source of the tape and the 11-page transcript that surfaced over the weekend. GOP leaders said Ganske's campaign staff did not record the meeting, and they are confident that the other meeting participants didn't, either.

"Everyone in the room was a supporter of Congressman Ganske," Larson said. "We have not talked to every single person, (but) everyone we have been able to get hold of has denied any involvement whatsoever. "

The Ganske campaign said it learned about the tape recording from Obradovich, a political and state government reporter for Lee Enterprises, which publishes the Quad-City Times and several other Iowa newspapers.

Obradovich said in a newspaper column that Democratic sources had given her a transcript of the Ganske meeting on the condition that they not be identified. She also quoted from the 11-page transcript. The Ganske campaign distributed copies of the transcript it had obtained from Obradovich to reporters over the weekend.

"I can't say anything more about it," Obradovich said Monday. Her husband, Jim, is a Statehouse lobbyist.

Earlier in the day, Rob Tully, the Iowa Democratic Party's vice chairman, issued a blanket denial that Democratic operatives had eavesdropped on the Ganske meeting.

"No staff of the Iowa Democratic Party or Citizens for Harkin attended or recorded private political meetings of the Ganske for Senate campaign, including Congressman Ganske's meeting at the Savery Hotel earlier this month. Any assertion of illegal activity here is completely ludicrous," Tully said.

Armistead said the transcript pointed to the opposing camp because it appears to have been professionally prepared and because it highlighted a passage quoting Ganske on attacking Harkin.

(Excerpt) Read more at dmregister.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: ganske; harkin; senate; wiretapping
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last
Well, now things are getting VERY interesting. This could get messy
1 posted on 09/24/2002 5:29:11 AM PDT by Iowa Granny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Iowa Granny
Yeah, but too early. Most swing voters have a 3 week memory retention limit so this will all be "Old News" by election time.
2 posted on 09/24/2002 5:32:01 AM PDT by corkoman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: corkoman
Maybe not.
3 posted on 09/24/2002 5:35:29 AM PDT by tet68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Iowa Granny
RE:  "We made a mistake, and we're sorry"

I don't know about anyone else, but I'm
sick as hell of that  "I'm sorry, let's move on"
crap. You do the crime; you do the time.

GRRRRRR   &^%%^$#@#@

 

4 posted on 09/24/2002 5:38:32 AM PDT by Deep_6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: corkoman
Yeah, but too early. Most swing voters have a 3 week memory retention limit so this will all be "Old News" by election time.

Not if the probe takes 6 weeks to execute.

5 posted on 09/24/2002 5:39:18 AM PDT by copycat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: corkoman
That's exactly why Harkin told 'em to admit it NOW and get it behind them. Let's hope the investigation really happens, and happens quickly.
6 posted on 09/24/2002 5:41:35 AM PDT by savedbygrace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Deep_6
Yeah, but for a 'Rat, its an adequate defense, because the lamestream press pushes the line and the sheeple swallow it. OTOH, if you're a 'Pub, they'll hang it on you every day until you lose the election, and probably for a long time after that.

Never let it be said that 'Rats don't play dirty. Of course, when you're dirt, that comes naturally.

7 posted on 09/24/2002 5:42:26 AM PDT by chimera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Iowa Granny
Harkin is a low life snake, as slimy as clinton and bowels.
8 posted on 09/24/2002 5:42:27 AM PDT by boomop1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: corkoman
Yeah, but too early. Most swing voters have a 3 week memory retention limit so this will all be "Old News" by election time.

I think Ganske should run commercials referring to Harkin as: "Senator Nixon from Iowa."

That'll keep it in the news.

9 posted on 09/24/2002 5:42:31 AM PDT by Oschisms
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Iowa Granny
How is it a "mistake" to knowingly do something?
10 posted on 09/24/2002 5:46:33 AM PDT by Illbay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Illbay
This "mistake" is 1) patently illegal and 2) a sure sign that the Harken campaign is in dire straights. Given the normal "baseline" of Democratic corruption in every election, even Dems don't go "this" dirty with six weeks before election day unless they are behind the eight ball in a closing race. Harken's campaign must be terribly afraid of losing this election to pull a hair brained stunt like this and then act like nothing happned. If Harken was confident in winning, he would stick to just having the dead vote on election day to boost his margin of victory.

Ganske should be making this point into everyone's ear at every opportunity in a not to subtle way.

jriemer

11 posted on 09/24/2002 5:55:36 AM PDT by jriemer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: chimera
Exactly - - the dems will get a pass, but if a republican did this....remember watergate......??
12 posted on 09/24/2002 5:57:49 AM PDT by duckbutt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Iowa Granny
This could get messy

Like a pile of dung?

13 posted on 09/24/2002 6:11:17 AM PDT by TC Rider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BigWaveBetty; lodwick; Hillary's Lovely Legs
According to an email distributed by the Ganske campaign on Saturday morning, a poll shows Ganske closing in on Harkin. Ganske 41%, Harkin 45%.

It's not likely that Iowa voters will be allowed to forget this nasty little trick. I know I'm going to get out the check book for another donation, and I think others will, too.
14 posted on 09/24/2002 6:12:57 AM PDT by Iowa Granny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: savedbygrace
That's exactly why Harkin told 'em to admit it NOW and get it behind them. Let's hope the investigation really happens, and happens quickly.

Back in the 90s we had a similar case here in NC. Former GUV4LIFE Jim Hunt had one of his cronies tape a cell call, similar to the Florida deal. It was years later when someone finally got their hand slapped. Of course, that was Reno Justice.

15 posted on 09/24/2002 6:13:12 AM PDT by TC Rider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: duckbutt
Yes, and its an ironic parallel. Nixon got into trouble for taping himself. Here a likely 'Rat sympathizer tapes someone else without their consent, Harkin broadcasts it, and then says, oops, sorry, "Mistakes Were Made", "Let's Move On".
16 posted on 09/24/2002 6:20:21 AM PDT by chimera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: jriemer
The only way this will become an issue is if the media are forced to confront it. Otherwise, it will go away.

Betcha absolutely nothing will be said on the nightly network news.

You have two options: (1) Rush (at least that gets a few millions in the know, even if it is preaching to the choir); and (2) O'Reilly (he's very useful in that the "uncommitted" often tune him in).

17 posted on 09/24/2002 6:27:05 AM PDT by Illbay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: chimera
Actually, the reference wasn't to taping, but to the cover-up of the break-in. That incident was also "a mistake"--and Nixon didn't even know about it till after the fact.

This is a good analogy, in that the cover-up was NOTHING compared to some of the Dems' horrid crimes.

18 posted on 09/24/2002 6:29:16 AM PDT by Illbay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Iowa Granny
Where are all of those who keep voting Harkin into office located? Are they mainly in college towns and the larger cities such as Des Moines? I think he also gets a lot of farmers votes.
19 posted on 09/24/2002 6:33:38 AM PDT by Piquaboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Piquaboy
Well, here's one brand new Iowa voter who is going to relish voting against Harkin!
20 posted on 09/24/2002 6:37:31 AM PDT by alley cat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson