Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/23/2002 3:27:30 PM PDT by William McKinley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last
To: William McKinley
THE WHORE HAS SPOKEN.
39 posted on 09/23/2002 4:07:51 PM PDT by Big Guy and Rusty 99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: William McKinley
I've seen some clips of the speech, on FNC. You would think that goober would hire someone to teach him how to speak.
40 posted on 09/23/2002 4:10:17 PM PDT by Paul Atreides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: William McKinley

44 posted on 09/23/2002 4:15:16 PM PDT by mhking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: William McKinley
I heard that the Whitehouse reply to this was Gore "is irrelevant and out of touch with his own party."

HAHAHAHAHAHAH....great reply.

46 posted on 09/23/2002 4:17:23 PM PDT by Sungirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: William McKinley
Al ...we need ya buddy in the war effort..get your gear together and get going ...next stop Bagdad, yep Bagdad! Now dont go anwhere else till we call ya....
50 posted on 09/23/2002 4:25:11 PM PDT by woofie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: William McKinley
I was one of the few Democrats in the U.S. Senate who supported the war resolution in 1991.

And you supported Bubba's impeachment-deflection in 1998, and again in June 2000, you were for this.

Yet another "new" Al Gore flip-flop....we're tired of your flapping in the wind...

You lost.

You aren't President (Praise be to God)

GET OVER IT.

Don't you have a class to teach or something better to do?

51 posted on 09/23/2002 4:26:55 PM PDT by NorCoGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: William McKinley
Hell Bump
52 posted on 09/23/2002 4:31:47 PM PDT by Pagey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: William McKinley
I’m speaking today in an effort to recommend a specific course of action for our country which I believe would be preferable to the course recommended by President Bush

I am such a smart weenie.

55 posted on 09/23/2002 5:00:27 PM PDT by Tom Bombadil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: William McKinley
For those who may wish to forget, Gore was VP of this great nation for 8 years (1992-2000). And…during those eight years, he and his administration had many chances to fix many problems including those of world terrorism. And what is Mr. I-Can-Do-Everything Gore’s record?

1. The Feb. 26, 1993, bombing of the World Trade Center.

2. The 1995 bombing in Saudi Arabia, which killed five U.S. military personnel.

3. The April 19, 1995 bombing of the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City killing 168 Americans.

4. The 1996 Khobar Towers bombing in Saudi Arabia, which killed 19 and injured 200 U.S. military personnel.

5. The 1998 bombing of U.S. embassies in Africa, which killed 224 and injured 5,000.

6. The 2000 bombing of the USS Cole, which killed 17 and injured 39 U.S. sailors

56 posted on 09/23/2002 5:38:00 PM PDT by 45Auto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: William McKinley
Ok, this guy needs to STOP inhaling.

5

58 posted on 09/23/2002 5:59:23 PM PDT by rintense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: William McKinley
Gore in 1991, after the Gulf War had concluded:
What little criticism Bush is getting comes from potential presidential challengers like Sen. Albert Gore Jr., D-Tenn., who supported Bush's call to arms against Iraq, but now says he hasn't been tough enough.

Gore said last week that Saddam must be forced to destroy everything he could use to make nuclear weapons. He said he would support military strikes against Iraqi targets to accomplish that goal if necessary.
-- HOUSTON CHRONICLE, 07/21/91, page 16

Hmm -- now he's whining about how US military strikes on Iraq for the same purpose would be indefensible.

Also:

WASHINGTON - A leading Senate Democrat on Wednesday accused President Bush of making a conscious decision to keep Saddam Hussein in power in Iraq, suggesting it was part of the administration's foreign policy of coddling dictators.

"In what turned out to be the closing days of war with Iraq, he made a conscious decision that it was in the interests of the United States for Saddam Hussein to remain in power," said Sen. Al Gore , D- Tenn., a member of the Senate Armed Services Committee.

[snip]

"This is a pattern in the Bush [41] foreign policy. He wants to support whoever is in power no matter how odious and despicable the human rights violations, the anti-Americanism, the nuclear proliferation or whatever."

Gore said Bush now has embraced Syrian President Hafez Assad, also a member of a Baathist Party. Gore termed Assad and Saddam "followers of the same bloodthirsty ideology."
-- HOUSTON CHRONICLE, 07/18/91, Page 3

Yeah, heaven forbid the elder Bush should decide to leave a dictator like Saddam in power just because it was in America's interest not to rock the boat.

Oh, wait... Isn't that what Gore is now arguing?

59 posted on 09/23/2002 8:49:49 PM PDT by Dan Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson