Well hey, maybe we need a new second law.
Actually, I don't see how this necessarily follows from this finding. There are a lot of other questionable and unstated assumptions that have to be made to get from here to there. Also, this seems to use a naive (quasi-Newtonian) interpretation of the second law, rather than the full expression of it (which is rarely brought up because it is ugly, makes the math complicated, and usually isn't necessary). *shrug*.
One of my favorite parts of science is that stuff always changes, although there IS slow convergence with time.