Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AllSmiles
I assume you mean you are pro-reproductive choice

I consider myself a libertarian, yet I do not believe in so-called pro-reproductive choice.

In my opinion, the "choice" was made when the woman spread her legs. Becoming pregnant is a consequence of that choice.

All actions have consequences, and with freedom/liberty comes responsibility. Freedom/liberty without responsibility is anarchy. The action of having sex has a (possible) consequence of becoming pregnant. When that happens, it should be the responsibility of that woman to bring that baby to term. If she did not want the baby, then she should have thought about it before she spead her legs.

Anything other than that takes away from the life, liberty and pursuit of happiness of the child she created. If she would have used wisdom and self control, then she would have never have spead her legs in the first place IF she did not want a baby. Allowing a woman to abort a baby takes away the consequences of her poor choice.

Al least that's my opinion on the matter.

I'll have to get back with you on this a lil' later today. It's time for church.

55 posted on 09/22/2002 8:51:58 AM PDT by bat-boy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson