THE DEMOCRAT PARTY IS BEYOND CORRUPT, IT'S ALSO EVIL WARNS JIM ROBINSON IN SCATHING ATTACK OF TRUTH

freerepublic ^ | 9/21/2002 | Jim Robinson

[UnBlinkingEye]

How much do you expect in 21 months?

More globalism, increase in federal government, additional laws and regulations...

[Jim Robinson]

Well, I guarandoubletee you that the Democrats aren't gonna do it. That's all we have.

[Texasforever]

More globalism, increase in federal government, additional laws and regulations...

Examples of each please.

[MileHi]

Happy?

Dodged the point again, didn't you Roscoe?

No, I am not happy that that most judges are socialists. I would be no more happy if they were Stalinist fascists like you.

[Roscoe]

No, I am not happy that that most judges are socialists.

With a Democrat Senate, you'll have plenty more. You want a Democrat Senate, vote 3rd Party.

[UnBlinkingEye]

Hey Joe,

Our government no longer seems to be of the people, by the people and for the people.

[Texasforever]

Our government no longer seems to be of the people, by the people and for the people.

When was the right to vote repealed?

[aruanan]

I see allowing a Democrat to remain in power when it could have been prevented as a triumph of evil.

That's for sure.

[AAABEST]

I think you are a tremendous voice for freedom of speech and return to Constitutional government.

If you think he's good now, you should have seen him when he was really on fire. Posting writings from dead patriots, angrily putting the foot in everyone's ass .... the whole nine yards.

Every other word out of his mouth was "constitution", the remaining 50% of the words were a combination of "freedom" and "liberty".

Jim has a tendency to go conformist on us. Probably for good reason as he's a big time tactician.

[MileHi]

You want a Democrat Senate, vote 3rd Party.

Or vote for a "conservative" like you... Gee, I'll have to get back to you on that.

You could be a poster boy for all the reasons not to vote Republican. You haven't convinced me yet, but damn you just might.

[UnBlinkingEye]

When was the right to vote repealed?

Why did less than half of those eligible to vote cast a vote in the last election?

[Cultural Jihad]

Why did less than half of those eligible to vote cast a vote in the last election?

Libertarians got their load of hash in? Who knows?

[Roscoe]

If you like leftist judges, vote Libertarian.

[Jim Robinson]

"Why did less than half of those eligible to vote cast a vote in the last election?"

Because most of them are dumb as dirt and the Demos couldn't wake them from their drug induced stupors in time to catch the poll bus. Those who care enough, voted.

[Joe Hadenuf]

More globalism, increase in federal government, additional laws and regulations...

You want examples? How about ships lined up from the Port of Long Beach to Hawaii, bumper to bumper across the ocean, ships with names like Yang Ming North etc, ships that are coming in 24 hours a day, so fast the trucks can hardly drive underneath the cranes fast enough so 60 foot containers can be dropped on them, the trucks are bumper to bumper trying to exit these massive cargo container terminals, so much truck traffic, it sometimes takes an hour just for a truck to leave the terminals.

And remember, most all of these super container ships are not being loaded. They are being unloaded. One needs to see this for himself. Its 24 hours a day, never ending, as we speak........

Think of our jobs, our manufactuing, that have died. Just think about it, as you imagine these ships lined up from here to China, literally, no kidding.

[TLBSHOW]

Interesting site!

Mid-term elections usually mean low voter turnout, with the largest segment of those who vote being 65 and older.

http://bcbshealthissues.com/hcpolitics2002/

[Texasforever]

Why did less than half of those eligible to vote cast a vote in the last election?

It sure wasn't the lack of 3rd party candidates at least 5 were running candidates. So I guess a 3rd party is not the answer to getting all those voters off their butts huh?

[MileHi]

If you like leftist judges, vote Libertarian.

Shallow and lame. Another dodge. In other words, everything I have come to expect from you.

[Willie Green]

Well, the real key here is to drastically reduce the size and scope of government so it does not require such a heavy tax burden to support it.

That is certainly a goal with which I can agree.

10% (or less) has a reasonable "feel" to it, but I'm somewhat puzzled as to how to come up with a crude estimate of the effects. But who knows? It sounds like a challenging task so maybe I'll wade through the budgets and economic data over the next few days and see if I can come up with something halfway reasonable.

LOL!!! I'm sure anything I come up with is gonna be pretty crude and subject to all kinds of criticism. But you got me curious to see if it's possible to come up with something that is at least worthy of discussion. I'll let you know in a few days.

[ClancyJ]

What does it matter whether FR is officially anything?

We are talking about moving forward against liberalism takeover.

We are in a war in this country - a war between the direction the Republicans can take us and the direction the Dems can take us.

We need to make tactical decisions to win this war - not emotional ones. Sure in war it is courageous and honorable to face the enemy marching in a coordinated line directly into the fire. Many, many are killed defeating the purpose of the march in the first place. Yet, they stood up and showed how honorable they were.

In the revolutionary war, the patriots realized how costly was that statement of honor and decided to hide while they shot at the enemy. They made a lot more progress with fewer people that way.

The same is true now in this battle to decide which direction we will move this country. Each of us has a choice aid the Republicans or aid the Democrats.