Skip to comments.
White House Backs $3.8 Bln Loan to Poland for Lockheed F-16s
Bloomberg.com ^
| 09-21-2002
| Bloomberg
Posted on 09/21/2002 6:33:05 AM PDT by montag813
Edited on 07/19/2004 2:10:41 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
Washington, Sept. 20 (Bloomberg) -- The White House has asked Congress to approve a $3.8 billion long-term loan to Poland to buy 48 Lockheed Martin Corp. F-16 fighter jets, weapons and logistics support.
Lockheed is competing against France's Dassault Aviation SA and Saab AB, the Swedish maker of Gripen fighters with partner BAE Systems Plc, for the contract, which is worth an estimated $3.5 billion.
(Excerpt) Read more at quote.bloomberg.com ...
TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government
KEYWORDS: aid; f16; loan; poland
Why are we further straining an already-stressed budget for unneccessary foreign aid to a non-critical ally? $4 billion with a "long-term loan"? That is as good as free, and greater than the yearly aid total for Israel. Yet this is getting little notice. With Lockheed Martin trading near a 52-week high, they hardly need the corporate welfare.
1
posted on
09/21/2002 6:33:06 AM PDT
by
montag813
To: montag813
FMS is not a bad thing, it has helped undermine communist weapons dealers and socialist manufacturers for 30 years.
The real devil in this program will be International Offset Contracts in which the US manufacturer will transfer a certain amount of technology and production work to Polish industries.
US jobs are undermined in such situations.
To: montag813
I agree. If we have money laying around for long-term loans, we have money to pay for the concurrent receipt of retirement and disability compensation for our own military. Not prudent to loan money when you owe money for critical services already performed.
3
posted on
09/21/2002 7:05:31 AM PDT
by
Eastbound
To: R. Scott; Militiaman7
FYI - Bump
4
posted on
09/21/2002 8:00:22 AM PDT
by
Eastbound
To: Eastbound
Thanks for the ping. I agree.
To: montag813
I imagine it's probably a wash. On the one hand, if we have offered the loan on favorable terms, the financing may cost us some money. On the other hand, if we expand the market for American military aircraft, it will bring down the cost per plane. The more planes you produce, the less the cost per plane is the usual rule.
No doubt the competition to sell military aircraft to other countries may sometimes lose us some money, but the alternative--to let the Europeans gain a world market for their aircraft--is undesirable.
6
posted on
09/21/2002 9:42:04 AM PDT
by
Cicero
To: montag813
7
posted on
09/21/2002 11:39:00 AM PDT
by
Orion78
To: Eastbound
Bureaucrats care little for the retired disabled vets. Now, they have to ensure NATO is as strong as possible gotta watch those Serbs.
8
posted on
09/22/2002 4:22:11 AM PDT
by
R. Scott
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson