Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrats Are Fined $243,000 for Fund-Raising Violations (People's Republic of China and Clinton)
nytimes ^ | 9/21/2002 | RICHARD A. OPPEL Jr.

Posted on 09/20/2002 10:14:08 PM PDT by TLBSHOW

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 301-318 next last
To: ladyinred
By suggesting otherwise, you're saying that this is the only thing Clinton and his cronies did wrong - because this is the only thing that I have seen a hand slapped for, or should I say a mild rebuke.....No - make that a secret double probation....

This means that Clinton or Gore or Reno did nothing wrong during their administration, because what punishment did they receive for the illegal campaign contributions - the illegal pardons, etc. etc.

81 posted on 09/23/2002 1:58:20 AM PDT by M. Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: ladyinred
Bump for this "blink and you missed it" story.
82 posted on 09/23/2002 7:19:46 AM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
Mr. Cooper said the documents provided further evidence of the tactics Democratic operatives used to raise money before the 1996 elections. "Here, we're dealing with wire transfers and shuffling money to accounts...",

I missed this story on Friday BUMP

83 posted on 09/23/2002 2:01:59 PM PDT by Pagey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: highpockets
Sure glad this came out on Friday

Just one more action intentionally swept under the rug.I sure wish someone at FOX NEWS would mention this tonight.If it was a Republican committing crimes,it would've been the main story all weekend.(I need to Freep Al Gore when he runs in 2004.)

84 posted on 09/23/2002 2:05:39 PM PDT by Pagey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
more proof of organized crime in the DNC.
85 posted on 09/23/2002 2:14:47 PM PDT by KSCITYBOY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
BUMP. I just did a search on CNN.com for this story and found nothing. And the NYT link now says "Speicified server could not be found" so this story was buried right quick.
86 posted on 09/24/2002 10:39:09 AM PDT by Musket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend
Yes, he's the best, isn't he? I really like him and Jim Angle, too. They're gentlemen.
87 posted on 09/24/2002 10:52:53 AM PDT by Marysecretary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
I LOVE IT!
88 posted on 09/24/2002 10:53:57 AM PDT by Marysecretary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mulliner
Oh. Thanks for clearing that up for me.
89 posted on 09/24/2002 10:57:05 AM PDT by Marysecretary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: snopercod
Since 1996, Norton has been Associate Director in the CFTC’s Division of Enforcement, where he supervises investigations of financial fraud and trading violations, and is director of the litigation team. He also develops and implements policy and special initiatives, advises the CFTC Commissioners and division heads on regulatory and legal issues, is a standing member of multi-agency task forces and is an adjunct instructor with the National Institute of Trial Advocacy.

He has been an Assistant Director at the Federal Trade Commission, where he supervised consumer protection investigations and litigation. Before joining the federal government, Norton was an Assistant Attorney General in the Civil Litigation Division of the Maryland Attorney General’s Office. He graduated Order of the Coif from the University of Maryland School of Law and was Assistant Editor of the Maryland Law Review.

90 posted on 09/24/2002 11:56:01 AM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: kcvl
Thanks. So Noble was a clinton appointee. 'nuf said.
91 posted on 09/24/2002 12:17:32 PM PDT by snopercod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: tallhappy
Hogan & Hartson L.L.P. (Hogan & Hartson) is the largest law firm based in Washington, D.C. Today, the firm has more than 900 attorneys serving clients in a practice that cuts across virtually all legal disciplines. In addition to its headquarters in Washington, D.C., which provides a natural base for the firm's national and international practice, the firm has European offices in Berlin, Brussels, London, Paris, Budapest, Prague, Warsaw, and Moscow, Asian offices in Beijing and Tokyo, and U.S. offices in New York, Baltimore, Northern Virginia, Miami, Los Angeles, Denver, Boulder and Colorado Springs.

Hogan & Hartson's status as a leading international law firm is well established. Describing the firm as among the "International Elite," The Legal Times observed that "with size, Hogan is able to offer . . . one-stop shopping for regulatory, litigation and corporate needs." Recently, the firm served as counsel in a number of significant international and domestic deals, including the largest private-public venture in South American history, the largest merger and acquisition to date in Central and Eastern Europe, the first true project financing without governmental credit support or performance guarantees in Central and Eastern Europe, the $10 billion conversion to a real estate investment trust (REIT) of one of the largest owners of full-service and luxury hotels in the U.S., and one of the largest Internet-related IPOs to date. In addition, the firm served as antitrust counsel in the largest industrial merger ever. Hogan & Hartson was the only Washington, D.C.-based law firm ranked in The American Lawyer's 1999 Corporate Scorecard and was among the top firms in nine of the annual rating categories, including the top ten for representation of companies in public stock offerings and venture-backed companies in initial public offerings.

In the litigation area, the firm argued eight cases before the Supreme Court in the past two terms; has been involved in a number of recent high profile Congressional and governmental investigations; mounted a successful constitutional challenge to Section 505 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996; and served as principal Washington, D.C. counsel to Netscape Communications Corporation — the Department of Justice's lead witness in the government's landmark antitrust case against Microsoft Corporation.

Hogan & Hartson's clients range from start-up ventures to large multinational corporations in industries such as information technology; health care; biotechnology; pharmaceuticals; medical devices; education; food and agriculture; communications (satellite, common carrier, broadcast, and cable); energy; environmental; government procurement; real estate; and transportation and infrastructure. In addition, the firm represents private equity, venture capital and investment banking firms, financial institutions, nonprofit associations, quasi-governmental organizations, and foreign governments.

Forty percent of Hogan & Hartson's attorneys currently handle corporate, securities, financial, tax, and other transactions for clients throughout the world. Nearly thirty percent litigate commercial and other disputes before state, federal and international tribunals, and engage in domestic and international arbitration. The remaining thirty percent of the firm's practice is in the area of national and international government regulation and policy

Hogan & Hartson's attorneys combine their legal experience with a solid grounding in the business world and in government. Many of the firm's attorneys have served in senior levels of government, including the United States Congress and the Executive Branch, the European Commission, and with European national governments. The firm counts among its number two former Chairmen of the Republican National Committee; a former outside General Counsel to the Democratic National Committee; a former Secretary of Agriculture and U.S. Trade Representative; a former Head of the European Commission's Washington Delegation; a former Principal Deputy Solicitor General of the United States; a former FTC Commissioner; and four former members of Congress, including the former House Republican Leader. Others have served as in-house corporate counsel, corporate officers or members of corporate boards of directors.

Recently, Corporate partner Warren Gorrell was recognized as one of the top dealmakers of 1998 in The American Lawyer's 1999 Corporate Scorecard. The National Law Journal featured partner John Roberts as one of Washington, D.C.'s "power lawyers" for 1998 in recognition of his frequent appearances (which now number 30) before the Supreme Court. Communications partner Michele Farquhar was named one of Wireless Magazine's "Top 50 Newsmakers" in 1998; European Counsel's "Telecoms Industry Report 1998" described Gerry Oberst, another partner in the Communications Group, as "the key satellite lawyer in Brussels;" and Christine Varney, head of the firm's Internet practice, was featured in The Washington Post as one of five D.C. lawyers who distinguished themselves in 1998. In previous years, The National Law Journal has recognized antitrust partner Janet McDavid, who was just elected Chair of the ABA Section on Antitrust Law, as one of the "50 Most Influential Women Attorneys," partner Cliff Stromberg as one of "40 Health Care Lawyers Who Have Made Their Mark," and partner Bill Reyner as one of the "leading communications lawyers."

92 posted on 09/24/2002 12:23:21 PM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: goldilucky; KLT; backhoe
this one deserves a hard bttt
93 posted on 02/10/2003 12:27:24 AM PST by WatchNKorea ( http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a3a37a7ce78f9.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: RJCogburn
No serious fines...no serious jailtime. Is it too much to hope that some die-hard Dems may see the light and NOT vote for corrupt liberals in the next election? Er...wait...what am I thinking. This is just another example of the right wing conservative media picking on the poor lefties.
94 posted on 02/10/2003 12:52:12 AM PST by enemy9oclock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: WatchNKorea
A HARD BUMP HERE! Although Judicial Watch has made a reputable name for itself and is a non-profit judicial watchdog, it appears from the above post that it is in some stiff competition image-wise both domestic and abroad.
95 posted on 02/10/2003 7:09:38 PM PST by goldilucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: WatchNKorea
I sent you two freepmails.
96 posted on 02/10/2003 7:21:57 PM PST by goldilucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: goldilucky; KLT; Mia T; backhoe; Wolverine; Cindy; Lulu; LoneGreenEyeshade; All
"...that it is in some stiff competition image-wise both domestic and abroad."

That's O.K. because there is no other entity investigating bastard Clinton's Chinagate. No other entity pursuing treasonous bitch Hillary. And what's on the news everyday now ie. Clinton and Carter's insane 'Agreed Framework' in which Clinton gave North Korea two light-water nuclear reactors which -in essence ...fully armed North Korea with nuclear bombs.

97 posted on 02/11/2003 6:13:46 AM PST by WatchNKorea ( http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a3a37a7ce78f9.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: goldilucky; GatĂșn(CraigIsaMangoTreeLawyer)
"Clinton Bankrolled North Korea's Nuke Program"
http://www.newsmax.com/showinsidecover.shtml?a=2002/10/17/80959

"Clinton Deal Gave N. Korea 100-Nuke-Per-Year Capacity"
http://www.newsmax.com/showinsidecover.shtml?a=2002/10/19/114657

98 posted on 02/11/2003 6:16:22 AM PST by WatchNKorea ( http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a3a37a7ce78f9.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: WatchNKorea
Clinton and Carter's insane 'Agreed Framework' in which Clinton gave North Korea two light-water nuclear reactors which -in essence ...fully armed North Korea with nuclear bombs.

I remember watching in disbelief as Clinton unveiled his masterplan for Nuclear Disarmament on the Korean Peninsula. My first thought was " If you promise to to use these reactors for nukes, we will build them for you,"

WHAT????? Thats like telling gang members they can have newly made automatic weapons if they promise not to shoot them. But the American people, myself included, are just as guilty for allowing the Clintons to screw us at every turn.

99 posted on 02/11/2003 6:18:58 AM PST by cardinal4 (Get the UN out of the US and get the US out of the UN!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: Musket
"I just did a search on CNN.com for this story and found nothing."

Surely this story was aired on abc, cbs, nbc and msnbc the week it came out...surely so? (yeah, right!)

100 posted on 02/11/2003 6:19:30 AM PST by WatchNKorea ( http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a3a37a7ce78f9.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 301-318 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson