Posted on 09/20/2002 2:46:42 PM PDT by weegee
Copyright 2002 Chicago Tribune
I was walking the dog and listening to a book on tape when I heard the brutal words.
"Jew boys."
There were no anti-Semites lurking on the sidewalk. The words were in my ears -- in my headphones, read matter-of-factly by the narrator of the book I was listening to contentedly a moment before, Dorothy L. Sayers' Unnatural Death, published in 1927.
I love Sayers' mysteries. Aristocratic sleuth Lord Peter Wimsey pursues evildoers with debonair wit, assisted by his manservant Bunter. I adore Sayers' literate style, her slow unwrapping of the truth, her theological asides. And I love the world she so richly depicts of English landed gentry with their clubs and morning coats and bafflement at the world of work -- so quaint, so charming in its outdated way, so ...
So bigoted, I had to admit, after replaying the line several times because I couldn't believe I had heard right.
[snip]
What was a previously admiring reader to do?
[snip]
Sayers' unconstrained bigotry is a mystery. But she still writes a fine one.
(Excerpt) Read more at chron.com ...
Basically the author tries to come to terms with political correctness during banned book week. Perhaps next she'll take on a less controversial work and press for Disney to release Song Of the South to a ready public. Oh wait, that was a movie based on a book. I guess that they can go ahead and ban it (even though it was released to video in England, Ireland, Japan, and Hong Kong).
Sayers was merely reflecting the sentiments of society as a whole at the time that she wrote.
I think I understand what you are trying to say but so what? As far as I know, the Chicago Tribune wasn't part of the consent decree. Except for the Wash Post, The LA Slime and their related toadies, FreeRepublic and as well as other forums have a "fair use" right to post a full article and discuss it.
It's not really racism . . . just an insular Englishwoman's distaste for the "different." The English of that era reflexively disliked and suspected anyone who didn't fit in that "world of English landed gentry." The poor little architect in Whose Body? who finds the dead body in his bath is pilloried for his working class accent that he tries unsuccessfully to hide. The social climbers in the world of advertising in Murder Must Advertise. Americans (in more novels than I can count). Orientals. Doubtful professional dancers/gigolos in Have His Carcase. Vaguely "Red" bohemians in Strong Poison.
But, like most English, if she knew you Ms. Sayers would always make an exception. In fact, IIRC she treats a Jewish family most sympathetically in Whose Body?
IMHO this is much ado about nothing at all. Chesterton did it too (used the "N" word in one of the Father Brown stories), so did Hilliare Belloc. Too darned many PC writers act as though their ideas are the pinnacle of civilization and every other age must conform or be case into outer darkness. . . . talk about throwing out the baby with the bathwater . . .
I was talking awhile back to the owners of a shop of Confederate novelties and memorabilia and the subject of "Song of the South" came up. They had the Japanese release on video with subtitles. Perhaps you are aware of how the original came to be taken off the market. I was not until one of the gentlemen explained it to me. He said that the rights to the movie were actually purchased by the NAACP so that they had absolute control over its distribution in the United States. Personally, I thought it was a delightful movie. Sometimes I wonder if the NAACP types don't hate these kinds of movies because they portray the "poor oppressed black victims" of racism as being well-adjusted, often even happy, men and women of faith and that image is counterproductive to their agenda.
I think that the majority of us only react to certain words because the PC crowd has conditioned us so well to do so. Personally, it bothers me more when stories and programs are sanitized to remove all potentially offensive words. That is not an accurate way of telling the stories.
A good example is one of my favorite TV shows, In the Heat of the Night, which portrays the racial changes taking place in the south at the time the show was created. I have probably seen every episode numerous times, as it was origianally done and with the *N* word edited. Having grown up in the south, listening to the edited versions are laughable, and in my opinion a really sorry effort to revise history.
Actually she wasn't. For one thing she probably knew litte about the anti-Jewish bent in American society, and cared even less.
Secondly, in context, the trigger phrase for the easily offended
"seemed to possess rather narrow feet and to wear the long-toed boots affected by Jew boys of the louder sort."
is no more evidence of "so-bigoted" than the use of the description "gangsta-style" would be.
Because of media distortions of history, the KKK is thought of as a strictly Southern phenomenon, when the organization was revived and made a national movement in the northern states of Michigan, Illinois and Indiana. Most of the klan activity in this country takes place in those and other former union states. Go figure.
I think that's basically true. There was a generalized dislike of the "other" and Jews were one of the most common "others" encountered at the time, but "Orientals" or "Asiatics," "Mediterraneans" or "Levantines" and other foreigners were treated in similar fashion.
Many who used language like Sayers and Christie were nonetheless appalled by Nazi brutality and atrocities. Using one word, like anti-semitism, for both discomfort or dislike and brutal and murderous atrocities doesn't convey the situation at the time. It seems to be more of a polemical, than a strictly descriptive usage. The fact that one word serves both, though, is a sign of how unfashionable such feelings have become, at least when expressed in public.
Our own contemporaries are aware of today's "acceptable" or "politically correct" prejudices and hold fast to them, but would be shocked and appalled if anyone acted violently upon them. So it was then.
Also, we have one side of the story. Sometimes the prejudices on the other side were strong as well, but not expressed in writing that is still popular.
You know, I had no idea what you were talking about until I did a google search of the title just now. Oh my. If the book is ever reprinted, of course, I suppose it will be known as "Ten Vertically-Challenged Anglo-Saxon Ruling-Class Oppressors And How They Got Theirs." Can't wait.
The poem is a hoot. All the "Cautionary Tales" are, such as "Jim, Who Ran Away from his Nurse, and Was Eaten by a Lion", or "Matilda, Who Told Lies and Was Burned to Death."
As a friend (and employer) of mine said, the real problem with all this PC garbage is that we miss so many good jokes . . .
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.