Skip to comments.
Saddam defends palaces against arms inspectors (DEVIL IN THE DETAILS, PART 4)
The Times ^
| September 20, 2002
| James Bone
Posted on 09/20/2002 2:04:45 AM PDT by MadIvan
IRAQ and America were locked in confrontation last night as Saddam Hussein rejected US attempts to give weapons inspectors access to his presidential palaces. The Iraqi President told the UN he would accept inspectors on condition that they did not violate Iraqs rights, sovereignty, security. The demand was immediately rejected by the US, which accused him of trying to lure the world down the same dead-end road it has travelled before.
The UN plans an early test of Saddams compliance. Hans Blix, the chief UN weapons inspector, told the Security Council that an advance party could arrive in Iraq on October 15 and conduct some inspections soon afterwards.
Earlier, it had emerged that Washington wants the inspectors to be given new powers to search Saddams eight presidential palaces. Under current rules of engagement, they have restricted access to the sprawling complexes.
President Bush stepped up the pressure for UN action by sending Congress a sweeping draft resolution demanding the power to remove Saddam using all means ... including force. He said: If the Security Council wont deal with the problem, the United States and some of our friends will.The White House also found itself in a row with Germany after Herta Däubler-Gmelin, the German Justice Minister, compared Mr Bush to Hitler, suggesting he was pursuing Iraq to divert attention from domestic problems.
TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: allies; iraq; notfooled; saddam; uk; usa
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 next last
The Germans are behaving outrageously. Looks like it is the USA, UK, Australia and Israel. And that's it.
Regards, Ivan
1
posted on
09/20/2002 2:04:45 AM PDT
by
MadIvan
To: schmelvin; MJY1288; MozartLover; Teacup; rdb3; fivekid; jjm2111; LonePalm; Gracey; Aric2000; ...
Bump!
2
posted on
09/20/2002 2:05:14 AM PDT
by
MadIvan
To: MadIvan
Who else would we need? That's the same ones who won WWII + Israel. I'd look for India to join as well, later on - plus Italy & Spain. The Krauts really $hit in their nest, didn't they?
3
posted on
09/20/2002 2:14:46 AM PDT
by
11B3
To: 11B3
Oh I wasn't complaining. ;)
Regards, Ivan
4
posted on
09/20/2002 2:18:36 AM PDT
by
MadIvan
To: MadIvan
I sure hope the Pentagon has ordered enough Daisy Cutters for all these palaces that Saddam built with the money that was supposed to feed starving children!
Daisy! Daisy! Give me your answer true!
To: SubMareener
Ah yes, the lovely Miss Cutter. ;)
Saddam will be meeting her soon, to be sure. ;)
Regards, Ivan
6
posted on
09/20/2002 2:31:23 AM PDT
by
MadIvan
To: MadIvan
After all these years of spending trillions of dollars on world opinion, the US is finally going to learn who its' real friends are in this world. We shouldn't spend another damned dime anywhere else.
7
posted on
09/20/2002 2:49:20 AM PDT
by
11B3
To: MadIvan
If it was up to the krauts currently in power the Berlin wall would still be up.
They are just pissed over the American destruction of East Germany.
8
posted on
09/20/2002 3:11:25 AM PDT
by
Rome2000
To: 11B3
Amen.
To: MadIvan
Nice that Abu Nidal, the number one terrorist of the 70's and 80's enjoyed a retirement dacha under the aegis and protection of the Iraqi's, what's their complaint now that we decide it's time to come knocking.
Three words. Kick. Their. Ass. Read the resolution: (excerpt). Yes we may take a number of civilian casualties. Yes, delay will only increase the probability the number will increase.
Whereas the United States has the inherent right, as acknowledged in the United Nations Charter, to use force in order to defend itself;
Whereas Iraqs demonstrated capability and willingness to use weapons of mass destruction, the high risk that the current Iraqi regime will either employ those weapons to launch a surprise attack against the United States or its Armed Forces or provide them to international terrorists who would do so, and the extreme magnitude of harm that would result to the United States and its citizens from such an attack, combine to justify the use of force by the United States in order to defend itself;
To: MadIvan
The UN plans an early test of Saddams compliance. Hans Blix, the chief UN weapons inspector, told the Security Council that an advance party could arrive in Iraq on October 15 and conduct some inspections soon afterwards.
Why bother? I guess the UN is okay with performing sham inspections, are they that naive to think that Saddamn isn't producing his crap in his so called palaces?
To: MadIvan
We won't need to inspect the palaces. They will be destroyed.
12
posted on
09/20/2002 4:35:42 AM PDT
by
tomahawk
To: MadIvan
Herta Däubler-Gmelin, the German Justice Minister, compared Mr Bush to Hitler One German minister has shown himself to be despicable. The Justice Minister should know that such a comparison is verboten in Germany. Remember that in an argument, the first person who calls the other a nazi or Hitler loses the argument, because it demonstrates that he's run out of ideas.
suggesting he was pursuing Iraq to divert attention from domestic problems
Sound familiar? I wonder if Herta has been talking to Terry McAwful and the DNC?
13
posted on
09/20/2002 4:49:37 AM PDT
by
jimtorr
To: 11B3
That's the same ones who won WWII + Israel.
Israel... a country whose people were saved in WWII by the allies, a situation loosely similar to an unimportant country in Europe called France.
Unlike France, our FRIENDS in ISRAEL, NEVER FORGOT!
Of course then there is the TOTALLY unPC question, SO unPC that I have never heard it debated in public until recently of whether the French were really conquered by or allied with the Germans.
It has also been too unPC to note until recently that Hitler was largely successful in his 'final solution to the Jewish question'.
Just some cheery thoughts to start the day. God Bless and by all means... 'Have a Good Day'
14
posted on
09/20/2002 4:53:09 AM PDT
by
johnb838
To: SubMareener
From Doc Holliday in 'Tombstone':
You're a Daisy if ya do it!
15
posted on
09/20/2002 4:55:21 AM PDT
by
johnb838
To: gorebegone
It's ok they should talk. They should keep right on chirping while we keep moving our chess pieces into position. Because I still don't think our Master Poker Player in Chief has shown all his cards. And when all our ships and planes and armor and personnel are in position, that's when he'll lay'em down and say "read 'em and weem, Sa-damn"
16
posted on
09/20/2002 5:01:27 AM PDT
by
johnb838
To: MadIvan
One would think that a German politician would be reticent to compare people to Hitler!
That's pretty unbelieveable IMHO...
17
posted on
09/20/2002 5:02:36 AM PDT
by
Axolotl
To: 11B3
The Krauts really $hit in their nest, didn't they? It's an ill bird that fouls its own nest.
Any coalition would be better WITHOUT the loonies!
To: MadIvan
Looks like it is the USA, UK, Australia and Israel. And that's it. I know I've done my share of France-bashing during the past year but I have a sneaking suspicion that when the bombs start falling in earnest some of them will be dropped by planes flying the tricolor. If I'm right they will have gone a long way toward redeeming themselves. We'll see.
To: MadIvan

I have always been one to try and use common sense and keep it as simple as possible. That said, I suggest we use cruise missiles and maybe a Daisy Cutter or two to "inspect" those places Sadam Insane places off limits.
20
posted on
09/20/2002 5:07:14 AM PDT
by
upchuck
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson