[rdb3]

Odd, here I am thinking that we were attacked on September 11, 2001 and we were responding to that attack.

What's odd about it? We are responding to the 9/11 attacks. But what's wrong with being able to smoke rogue terrorist states first?

[1Old Pro]

. But what's wrong with being able to smoke rogue terrorist states first?

I already heard Bush say we would go after all terrorist states and anyone who harbored or helped terrorists. We don't need any new stinkin proclaimations. We need to go and smoke'm.

[Stavka2]

Funny, last time I checked, terrorist nations like Saudi Arabia and Pakistan and the PLO were being negotiated with and protected, while the "axis" of evil nation N. Korea was having 2 nuke reactors built for it that it stated flat out would not be touched. The war on terror is turning into an excuse for anything but.