To: meia
Now you are just lying. The perps initially didn't dispute that the first car didn't pay at the toll booth, but that the second one did. Now they are saying that both cars paid. And you are claiming that they paid twice what was due. Besides being demonstrably false, why would they pay twice the amount due? You are so full of camel dung, I'm amazed that you can type in coherrent sentences.
91 posted on
09/19/2002 1:34:52 PM PDT by
anymouse
To: anymouse
Yeah, and she does all that with a burqua over her face and arms!
93 posted on
09/19/2002 1:39:34 PM PDT by
Palladin
To: anymouse
Now you are just lying. The perps initially didn't dispute that the first car didn't pay at the toll booth, but that the second one did. Now they are saying that both cars paid. And you are claiming that they paid twice what was due. Besides being demonstrably false, why would they pay twice the amount due? You are so full of camel dung, I'm amazed that you can type in coherrent sentences. Please provide evidence that they said they didn't pay the toll.
What they did say was that the driver of the second car saw the Police car pull off in pursuit of the first car that went through the toll booth. The driver of the second car asked the toll booth operator if the first driver had paid the toll. The operator said no. So the second driver paid for both cars thinking that the first had pulled through without paying and that was why the police was chasing them.
137 posted on
09/19/2002 2:59:59 PM PDT by
meia
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson