Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Woman on a Horse... [Re: Peyser's Attack on Fischl's "Tumbling Woman"]
The New York Sun ^ | September 19, 2002 | staff

Posted on 09/19/2002 11:34:26 AM PDT by paulklenk

Not since the communist Diego Rivera painted his mural for Rockefeller Center has there been such a ruckus about a piece of art in Midtown. The contretemps has erupted over Eric Fischl’s “Tumbling Woman,” which he sculpted during the weeks when he kept thinking of the image of bodies falling from the World Trade Center. “I didn’t see it,” he told our Rachel Donadio last week, “but it was the most complicated, infinitely complicated resonant image.” He captured it in the form of a woman in free fall, her legs in the air, her head and neck pulling her downward to the earth that will receive her. A memorably haunting sculpture, it was installed at Rockefeller Center, where it stood until it was encountered by the celebrated columnist of the New York Post, Andrea Peyser.

Ms. Peyser, herself a New York monument, issued a column that ran under the headline “Shameful Art Attack.” She called the Fischl work a violently disturbing sculpture. Is it art? she asked. Or assault? Near the sculpture she encountered a man who had witnessed bodies falling from the World Trade Center and who felt the sculpture was disgusting. “It’s awful,” she quoted him as saying. “It’s awful.” She also quoted a security guard who said he felt as if he were being dragged against his will back to the terrible day when he actually watched human beings fall from the sky. Within hours of Ms. Peyser’s column hitting the pavement, Rockefeller Center folded and announced that it would remove the work, which otherwise would have been on display through September 23.

The record will probably show that Mr. Fischl lasted longer at Rockefeller Center than Diego Rivera managed to do. His mural incurred the wrath of Old Man Rockefeller because it included a portrait of Lenin. Rockefeller wanted Lenin removed. Rivera’s assistants threatened to go on strike, and the great muralist agreed with them, refusing to remove Lenin but offering to put in some images of American heroes. One account of the imbroglio that we found on the Internet speculated that Rivera knew Rockefeller wouldn’t go for the compromise, because the artist surreptitiously had the mural photographed. Rockefeller had it covered up, but promised not to destroy it. The promise was broken, and the mural, in its original form, was reduced to powder. Rivera, and his wife, Frida Kahlo, returned to Mexico. The mural was put up in a new form in the Museum of the Palace of Fine Arts at Mexico City.

Somehow we have the feeling that New York was the loser in that transaction. Rivera may have been a communist, but he was a muralist with few peers (which is why Old Rockefeller wooed him to do the painting in the first place). Fischl, too, is a master painter. We’re no fans of a lot of what passes for public art around town, but “Tumbling Woman” is no abstract lump of bronze. It is an extraordinary rendering of a woman in one of the most gripping poses we can imagine in art. It captured a moment that will live in the imagination of New York forever, and it deserves a place in the city. Not, as we say, that we lack regard for the Great Peyser. She deserves her own statue, perhaps in that plaza in front of the News Corp. building on Sixth Avenue. Call it “Woman on a High Horse.” A good man for the job would be Eric Fischl.


TOPICS: Editorial; Extended News; US: New York
KEYWORDS: art; fischl; fishl; peyser; wtc
Finally, some rational words on this issue, instead of hysteria.
1 posted on 09/19/2002 11:34:27 AM PDT by paulklenk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: swarthyguy
For you, pal.
2 posted on 09/19/2002 11:42:41 AM PDT by paulklenk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paulklenk
For the curious, there's a photo on Ananova.

http://www.ananova.com/news/story/sm_674017.html?menu=news.latestheadlines

3 posted on 09/19/2002 11:45:39 AM PDT by forsnax5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: forsnax5
Thank you -- that's one of the better photos I've seen so far.

I am curious, however, to see how Fischl depicted her face.
4 posted on 09/19/2002 11:48:29 AM PDT by paulklenk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: paulklenk
I've seen pictures of that mural in Mexico City.

It's our loss.

This sculpture should be put outside the Saudi or Pakistani embassies in DC.
5 posted on 09/19/2002 12:12:53 PM PDT by swarthyguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paulklenk
And back atchya


6 posted on 09/19/2002 12:17:02 PM PDT by swarthyguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: swarthyguy
Why? So they can take pride in their handiwork?

I will never understand the need to celebrate murder and death.

7 posted on 09/19/2002 12:17:10 PM PDT by hopespringseternal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: swarthyguy
This sculpture should be put outside the Saudi or Pakistani embassies in DC.

Now, THAT's a good idea!

8 posted on 09/19/2002 12:17:11 PM PDT by forsnax5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: paulklenk
She's not wearing....spurs!
9 posted on 09/19/2002 12:18:44 PM PDT by Consort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hopespringseternal
Right. Go watch Oprah.

It's not celebrating. If you can't figure out the difference, forget it.

It's moot anyway. The whiners, the crybabies and the PC police have won. The statue has been removed.

We return to our regularly scheduled program now, folks.
10 posted on 09/19/2002 12:22:34 PM PDT by swarthyguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Jimer; Registered
That picture's an inspiration for a country and western song:

"Scarlett Left a Skid Mark on My Scarlet Satin Saddle"
11 posted on 09/19/2002 12:44:19 PM PDT by paulklenk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: paulklenk
Nice........balzonry.
12 posted on 09/19/2002 1:07:09 PM PDT by Consort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jimer
Correction: Nice.......blazonry.
13 posted on 09/19/2002 1:07:56 PM PDT by Consort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Jimer
Thanks for the correction; a sign you weren't born lazy.
14 posted on 09/19/2002 1:15:12 PM PDT by paulklenk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: paulklenk
This is a picture of the sculpture itself

. The article Peyser wrote is here.

15 posted on 09/19/2002 3:58:05 PM PDT by Ziva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paulklenk
Rockefeller wanted Lenin removed.

The present day rockefellers probably would have dug it up and put it on display it the old man hadn't smashed it to bits.

16 posted on 09/19/2002 4:35:10 PM PDT by joeyman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ziva
Did any of the jumpers fleeing flaming death pause to take all their clothes off?
17 posted on 09/19/2002 5:42:20 PM PDT by linton59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: paulklenk
Most of America outside of those who hang around Rockefeller Center in New York will never hear of this "controversy." More inside baseball from those in New York who think the rest of the country sits with bated breath, reading Page Six or the New York Post.
18 posted on 09/19/2002 6:02:21 PM PDT by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paulklenk
"Ms. Peyser, herself a New York monument, issued a column that ran under the headline “Shameful Art Attack.” She called the Fischl work a violently disturbing sculpture. Is it art? she asked."

I'm an artist myself. I rail against crudity for crudity's sake.

This piece is different. Its reality is poignant...truth is like that. The only criticism I have is that it should never have been displayed in NYC. Anywhere else, the piece would have been startling but thought provoking which is exactly the intent of the artist.

19 posted on 09/19/2002 6:29:06 PM PDT by brat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson