[rintense]

Ok, by trying to say that the VanDamn's lifestyle was the reason their daughter was killed. That is the scenario they tried to sell the jury. The jury who was on O'Reilly said the same thing and that the lawyer was very, very good. And that's where the problem lies. The lawyers knew how the crime was committed and who did it. To falsely mislead the jury into thinking it was someone else's fault is where the breach of ethics comes in. Perhaps I'm not explaining it correct. If you can catch the O'Reilly rerun, please do so. Judge Andrew does a nice job of summarizing the code.

[Jaded]

Even the Prosecutor said they did not know how he did it. Dusek also said they didn't have to prove it.