Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A clear and present danger-how lack of accountability erodes our national security
Neckbone

Posted on 09/18/2002 7:03:03 AM PDT by Neckbone

Since 9/11/01, national security has been sexy. It has been a topic on which suddenly everybody has an opinion, however influenced by the media, and everyone is willing to share it. Once again it has become, much to the chagrin of the phatic Left, okay to be cautiously isolationist. It is we of the clear eye and lucid mind who are questioning the refusal of airline security to offend or inconvenience those passengers who are statistically far more likely to pose a security risk than the old and infirm who are the favorite targets for screening. Of course we, the aquiescent majority, are a hell of a lot less trouble to detain.

It is this pervasive lack of a work ethic on the part of our federal beaurocracy that comprises the largest gap in the armor of our national security. It is not an issue of an overzealous FBI, an over-secretive CIA, or an overly-redundant DEA, although these are issues worth pondering. It all comes down to the fact that our federal administrative rank and file are, by and large, lazy.

When our President stated that he wanted the freedom to hire, fire, and hold accountable the men and women who would be tasked with defending our homeland security, he was roundly vilified. His motivations were characterized as “anti-worker” and “regressive” simply because he wished to have a workforce free of the stupefying effects of federal organized labor. Allow me to illustrate the current state of our post-911 beaurocracy:

An employee at one of my Ohio facilities is a registered alien, meaning that he has a legally-procured “Green Card” and as such has for the past ten years worked legally, paid taxes, and contributed to Social Security. It seems that this employee lost his Social Security card a few months back, and at the urging of his Human Resource Department went to the local Social Security office to register the loss and get a copy of the card. Here’s where the Machine took over. Instead of going through the necessary steps to log the loss and get a copy of the card, the clerk simply issued the man a new Social Security number. It turns out that issuing a new number is easier than going through the replacement process (for the clerk anyway).

The potential impact of this act of laziness is huge, once you think about it. Too much debt? Get a new Social Security number and start a new life. Is your brother-in-law Rashaad a little too militant to be allowed into the US? Hell, with a Social Security number he’ll be one of us! The clerk at the Social Security Administration office had, in the words of her supervisor when questioned later, “took a shortcut- it’s common when the office is busy.”

We all make jokes about the DMV, and we all have horror stories about governmental agencies. Has the time not come, however, when acts of aggredious inaction are no longer funny or acceptable? Hasn’t the time come to say “enough is enough! Get the lazy, the stupid, and the otherwise unemployable off of the federal payroll! Get the unions out of government!”?

Didn’t the time come already?


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: homelanddefense; socialsecurity

1 posted on 09/18/2002 7:03:03 AM PDT by Neckbone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Neckbone
bttt
2 posted on 09/18/2002 7:09:46 AM PDT by Neckbone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Neckbone
our federal administrative rank and file are, by and large, lazy.

This is trrue. If you know or have a family meber in the Federal Service, and department, these days you know for a fact it's all about "benefits", not "patriotism".

3 posted on 09/18/2002 7:11:24 AM PDT by RISU
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RISU
Which would be fine if it didn't mean a constant stream of people into our country with the sole aim of killing us. I don't expect everyone to be motivated by patriotism, I just want them to do their jobs.
4 posted on 09/18/2002 7:14:49 AM PDT by Neckbone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Neckbone
but Neckbone, why would they take jobs with the government if they wanted to actually do their jobs?
5 posted on 09/18/2002 7:18:44 AM PDT by WindMinstrel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: WindMinstrel
I recognize that your tongue is firmly in-cheek, but why, in these times of ours, do we still allow that behavior?
6 posted on 09/18/2002 7:20:24 AM PDT by Neckbone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Neckbone
because fully half of our government receives a sizeable chunk of its support from the federal employee union. Quid pro quo is the order of the day
7 posted on 09/18/2002 7:21:50 AM PDT by WindMinstrel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Neckbone; joanie-f; snopercod; JeanS; Covenantor; brityank
He can hire and fire any employee of the federal government, excluding hirees of the immediate Capitol and the immediate Supreme Court bldg. Those two branches of the federal government have the same power to hire and fire within their corridors.

All employees of the Executive Branch serve at the pleasure of the President; the Constitution recognizes only one such Chief Executive.

The war department of the federal government, over which the President is the Commander in Chief, includes federal employees not necessarily of the current sub-department known as the Dept. of Defense.

The proposed Dept. of Homeland Security, is a separate department than the DoD, but the DoHS is a also a sub-department within the war department. Same for the C.I.A., the N.S.A., etc. --- they are sub-departments of the war department of the federal government.

The President could have, at any time, grabbed a cab, gone over the DoD, and begun to appoint personnel to an operation satisfying the purposes he thinks necessary, and called the operation, the Federal Bureau of Homeland Security.

Instead, the President's natural inclination to prostrate himself before the Alter of the Beltway and submit a request for bigger government, rules him --- because he lets it, that is his nature.

When issuing the directions for establishing the Federal Bureau of Homeland Security under the war department, should have been among his work load from day1, the day he became aware of how serious was and is the threat from Fascist Islamism and fascist group-nationalizing socialism --- that's a day well in advance of September 11, 2001.

8 posted on 09/18/2002 10:00:49 AM PDT by First_Salute
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: First_Salute

The President's natural inclination to prostrate himself before the Alter of the Beltway and submit a request for bigger government, rules him --- because he lets it, that is his nature.... First_Salute


9 posted on 09/22/2002 7:54:14 PM PDT by joanie-f
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: joanie-f; snopercod; Covenantor; mommadooo3; brityank; TPartyType; tangofox; Alamo-Girl
One of my favorite films: "Last of the Mohicans"

Daniel Day-Lewis .... Hawkeye

Madeleine Stowe .... Cora Munro

Russell Means .... Chingachgook

Eric Schweig .... Uncas

Jodhi May .... Alice

Steven Waddington .... Heyward

Wes Studi .... Magua

10 posted on 09/23/2002 11:38:59 AM PDT by First_Salute
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: First_Salute
What do they call these departments which were created out of thin air [like the EPA]? Oh yes, Federal Independent Establishments.
11 posted on 09/23/2002 1:19:54 PM PDT by snopercod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: First_Salute
Mike,

It appears that we share similar taste in movies. This one is a classic (as is Cooper’s novel).


12 posted on 09/23/2002 6:26:56 PM PDT by joanie-f
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson