[Lorianne]

So you have decide that all women are unqualified and apt to do such a thing on the basis of...? Dianna's Law?

You are engaging in collectivist demonizing and pure speculation. It is irrational. Even if it was true, under your logic, men should not be allowed to serve in the military since some of them have been convicted of rape. Since a few have, all men should be held accountable for the actions of a few. After all, we know some men are going to rape. So why not indict all men pre-emptively before they get around to doing it?

[Dianna]

You are engaging in collectivist demonizing and pure speculation. It is irrational. Even if it was true, under your logic, men should not be allowed to serve in the military since some of them have been convicted of rape. Since a few have, all men should be held accountable for the actions of a few. After all, we know some men are going to rape. So why not indict all men pre-emptively before they get around to doing it?

No, what I am saying is that "some" women will engage in this behavior. Some women in every profession do, and being in close quarters on a submarine gives added "opportunities". The men, because of PC bullcrap have NO way to defend themselves. In this sense the women are getting special treatment not afforded by men because the brass will roll over every time.

I think our servicemen have enough to deal with, they shouldn't have to perform their job attached to the hip of another guy so that they can be sure to have a witness. The JOB is paramount, not "equality".