Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

EPA Orders Cleaner Burning Snowmobiles
CNSNews ^ | 9/16/02 | Jim Burns

Posted on 09/17/2002 5:59:17 AM PDT by Tumbleweed_Connection

The Environmental Protection Agency has, for the first time, established pollution standards for "non-road engines," including snowmobiles and all-terrain vehicles, officials of the agency said Monday. The new rules were created especially to deal with the pollution produced at national parks like Yellowstone and Grand Teton. They are an alternative to a ban on snowmobiling.

In all, 32 million vehicles will be affected each year by the new rules, the EPA said, resulting in a reduction of tons of hydrocarbons, nitrogen oxides and carbon monoxide from the air we breathe.

"If left unregulated, pollution from these sources will continue to increase," said EPA Administrator Christie Whitman. "When fully implemented, this action will not only protect public health, but will help restore the view of our nation's treasured scenic parks and wilderness areas.

Whitman expects the new standards will be fully implemented by 2006.

In all, 32 million vehicles will be affected each year by the new rules, the EPA said, resulting in a reduction of tons of hydrocarbons, nitrogen oxides and carbon monoxide from the air we breathe.

The new standards for snowmobiles call for reducing hydrocarbon and carbon monoxide emissions by "30 percent" in 2006 with further reductions coming in 2010 and 2012. EPA says snowmobiles currently emit more than 220,000 tons of hydrocarbons and 580,000 tons of carbon monoxide emissions each year into the air across the United States.

"These emissions contribute to air toxics (such as benzene) and fine particulate matter, which is largely responsible for visibility impairment at national parks," according to EPA.

The International Snowmobile Manufacturers Association is ready to meet EPA's challenge, according to its president Ed Klim, but Klim believes the rule requiring an additional 20 percent reduction of pollutants by 2010 is unjustified and unfairly singles out the snowmobile industry.

"Each of the four snowmobile manufacturers has introduced new models with low-emission-producing engines, and they will continue to develop and refine this technology," said Klim in a statement.

"Such engines, however, because of their size, configuration and cost, may not be suitable for all classes of snowmobiles," Klim added. "Forcing manufacturers to incorporate this technology into all classes of snowmobiles could jeopardize the family sport of snowmobiling, the future of the industry and the vitality of many communities where snowmobiling makes a major economic contribution."

Environmental Defense, an environmental issues organization, believes the standards should be even tougher. A spokeswoman for the organization said the new rules announced Monday are an EPA "snow job."

"EPA is squandering an important and highly cost-effective opportunity to cut pollution from these very dirty engines. The result is bad public policy that violates EPA's duty under the Clean Air Act to establish rigorous clean air standards," said Environmental Defense senior attorney Vickie Patton.

Earlier this year, the Bush Administration reversed the Clinton Administration's ban on snowmobiles in Yellowstone and Grand Teton National Parks, instead opting for the new emission standards on the non-road engines.


TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: epa; idiots; pollution; snowmobiles
What kind of a chance that SUV hydrogen technology might apply here?
1 posted on 09/17/2002 5:59:17 AM PDT by Tumbleweed_Connection
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
4 strokes with radiators..bigger machines
2 posted on 09/17/2002 6:08:58 AM PDT by joesnuffy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
What's the problem here? Snowmobiles will always burn cleanly if you stack them right.

LonePalm
3 posted on 09/17/2002 6:20:36 AM PDT by LonePalm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Sounds like Jocelyn Elders and her call for safer bullets.
4 posted on 09/17/2002 6:29:19 AM PDT by Piquaboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joesnuffy
How many of these bigger, heavier machines are going to wind up bogged down in the wilderness. How many people are going to wind up freezing to death because the machine weighs 100 pounds more than a conventional machine? How many more of these more complicated machines are going to break down, stranding their riders in the boonies?

Not that it's not the riders fault, or anything. But the inevitable result of this decision is going to mean more people freezing to death. And what have we gained? The Enviro-whackos just spit right back in our faces.

5 posted on 09/17/2002 7:26:43 AM PDT by gridlock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Comment #6 Removed by Moderator

To: gridlock
The new 4 stroke dirt bikes are within about 10 lbs of the 2 strokes. They get better milage, hook up better due to flatter power bands, need less frequent tune ups, run much cleaner and sound nicer.

The new 4 stroke GP-1 racers are lapping faster then the two strokes, admittedly with twice the displacement. But more 2 stroke horse power would not make a difference as the two strokes are not controllable even at 500cc.

I think four stroke technology is making two strokes obsolete for almost all applications. I'm not sure if very cold temperatures make a difference. Do 2 strokes do particularly well at 30 below?
7 posted on 09/17/2002 10:51:01 AM PDT by Jack Black
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MRAR15Guy56
There is no political or scientific consensus on CO2 and global climate change. On the other hand, there is no disagreement what-so-ever on the need to regulate CO, methane, VOCs, soot, CFCs, NOx, mercury, SO2, etc.

Bush's 1 1/2 year old policy reflects this.

8 posted on 09/17/2002 11:34:48 AM PDT by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson