Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Critical Habitat Designation for Piping Plover
Environmental News Service ^ | 09/12/2002

Posted on 09/16/2002 10:05:50 AM PDT by cogitator

Critical Habitat Designation for Piping Plover

WASHINGTON, DC, September 12, 2002 (ENS) - The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) has designated critical habitat for the Northern Great Plains population of piping plover, a threatened shorebird.

The designation includes 183,422 acres of habitat and 1,207.5 river miles in Minnesota, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota and Nebraska.

Designated areas of critical habitat include prairie alkali wetlands and surrounding shoreline; river channels and associated sandbars and islands; reservoirs and inland lakes and their shorelines, peninsulas and islands. These areas provide primary courtship, nesting, foraging, sheltering, brood rearing and dispersal habitat for piping plovers.

"The Service designated only those lands that we determined were essential to the plover's conservation based on the best scientific information currently available," said Ralph Morgenweck, the USFWS director for the Mountain-Prairie region. "We will continue working cooperatively with landowners to conserve prairie habitat and prairie species including the piping plover."

Critical habitat identifies specific geographic areas that are essential for the conservation of a threatened or endangered species and which may require special management considerations. Its designation affects activities where federal funding or a federal permit are involved.

The USFWS excluded a total of 13,154.5 acres and 130.5 river miles that had been proposed as critical habitat for the piping plover in June 2001. The North Dakota National Guard property on Lake Coe was excluded because the Camp Grafton Integrated Natural Resources Management Plan provides enough benefits for piping plovers, the USFWS said.

The agency also excluded 15 alkali lakes and wetlands in North Dakota and Montana after additional review of all of the data found they did not meet the survey criteria for numbers of times birds were found at sites. Nelson Reservoir was excluded because a Memorandum of Understanding between the Bureau of Reclamation, the USFWS and local irrigation districts, and a biological opinion are in place to help manage and conserve piping plovers.

Lake Francis Case was removed because additional information obtained during the comment period indicated piping plovers did not nest in this area. Also, operations of this lake make the availability of habitat during the nesting season very limited.

The area designated along the Platte River was reduced by 23 miles and the Niobrara River was reduced by nine miles after review of additional information received during the comment period.

A description of the critical habitat designation, including maps, is available at: http://mountain-prairie.fws.gov/pipingplover


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: endangeredspecies; habitat; pipingplover
Sure seems like a lot of land to me.
1 posted on 09/16/2002 10:05:50 AM PDT by cogitator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: cogitator
Yup. Kind of makes one thing it m ight *not* be about the piping plover after...hmmm?
2 posted on 09/16/2002 10:36:44 AM PDT by Black Agnes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TonyWojo; AAABEST; sauropod; countrydummy; Grampa Dave
Ping!
3 posted on 09/16/2002 11:45:33 AM PDT by Black Agnes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Black Agnes
I suggest having a "Piping Plover" egg hunt, involve the commnity kids. Whoever finds the most "Plover" eggs wins. Then take all the eggs gathered and commence boiling and dying them in various pretty colors. No more "Piping Plover".

It would be a fun time and a great way to eliminate what has apparantly become an expensive pest to the surrounding communities.

4 posted on 09/16/2002 12:07:07 PM PDT by AAABEST
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: AAABEST
I would suggest positive incentives to encourage people to voluntarily protect and enhance plover habitat. Regulation, force and punishment does NOT work and is destroying the economy and social fabric of our rural communities.
5 posted on 09/16/2002 5:07:42 PM PDT by marsh2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson