[Howlin]

BTW, did you notice he has YET to answer the question about who paid for his trip over there?

[Catspaw]

He did answer towards the end of the David Asman interview on Fox. His trip to Johannesburg AND Bagdad was paid for by the Institute for Public Accuracy. They're the same place paying for Rep. Nick Rahall's trip. Interesting history about the place, if you can dig it out.

[PhilDragoo]

BTW, did you notice he has YET to answer the question about who paid for his trip over there?

And Time didn't follow up.

Rather than tell the truth, Ritter cracks wise with the "kicking their ass" crap.

Ritter is crap--to Butler, whom I trust.

Ritter's head is spinning three-sixty:

Scott Ritter in 1998: Saddam is a threat.

Scott Ritter in 2002: Saddam is NOT a threat.

No inspectors, no evidence, but tens of thousands of dollars from pro-Saddam sources, and access to Iraq only given to those in total compliance to Saddam's wishes.

So he can make a pro-Saddam movie.

Waging Saddam's propaganda.

Hey, Scott Ass-kicker, did Saddam tell you why his agents met with Mohammad Atta?

Did he tell you why he harbors Al Qaeda operatives and training facilities?

Scott, why did you fail the polygraph and background check?

Did you kick the CIA's and FBI's asses, or are you only psycho with civilians?

When it comes to Saddam, is it "kicking ass" or "kissing ass"?