[mhking]

Discussion of the premise of the article welcomed.

The premise is based on supporting the questions. The questions are all leading in that regard.

Paul worded the questions (poorly if you ask me), and the answers fell right into the trap.

[Robert_Paulson2]

kinda like....
"have you stopped playing with yourself?" questions that have the underlying presumption...

The idea that statements by ritter, paid by iraq, is now authoritative on weapons... as we have also seen him backpeddling this week.. tell me that HIS "testimony" is pretty much weaker than wet toilet paper.

The noninitiation of force "doctrine" of the libertarian party is rather stupid when there is a clear and present danger to the people of the united states. Ron Paul is wrong to second guess the commander in cheif NOT having the intelligence reports in hand.

His second guessing, when he does not know, calls into serious question his judgement...
I like limited government. That is a libertarian leaning position. but the ostrich in sand attitude this dog and pony show versio of the "donahue" show, by an alleged republican... is a joke.