Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: nopardons
I just am having a very difficult time trying to understand why you you think that Eunice is lying and that the Muslim guys didn't say something volatile.

I don't think Eunice is lying at all. I think she is telling the truth as to what she believes. I also think it is probable that she is mistaken, at least in part. It happens all of the time. Look at some of the confusion right here on this thread where everything is recorded in writing. It is possible to overhear a conservation and get th wrong gist of it. That's all I'm saying. And the only reason I have my doubts is the way the police acted after the facts came out.

215 posted on 09/13/2002 10:27:40 PM PDT by CharacterCounts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies ]


To: CharacterCounts
Read post 211 before you stick your foot in your mouth anymore than you have already.
217 posted on 09/13/2002 10:33:22 PM PDT by John Lenin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies ]

To: CharacterCounts
Maybe the FBI told the locals to lay off. Perhaps they've been looking into these guys for awhile, or maybe, just maybe, they'll be watched now.

What if her son says that heheard the same thing ? What if there are other witnesses. How much " proof " do you demand , before you will believe ? This isn't like some fast moving rumor, she heard it. Replying to a thread ( you can hit the wrong nic, to reply to, you can forget whi said what, after reading 100s of posts, etc. ) isn't the same thing as HEARING someone /s say something loud enough for you to hear.

218 posted on 09/13/2002 10:33:39 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson