[FreedomFriend]

My point was that you talk of Iraq breaking UN resolutions, as though that is a reason to attack Iraq. Thus, you're giving legitimacy to the UN through their treaties.

I'm against an Iraq attack, as I haven't seen the evidence that Iraq is developing Weapons of Mass Destruction. Don't you think that if there were evidence, the government would have those images or statments all over television. All this time and no clear evidence, talks of deadlines that evidence will be shown? Come on, something is not right.

I'm hearing talks of nukes and attacking Baghdad. What about the innocent people, men, women and children, who will be killed. That's wrong. I don't care if the U.S. is saying that it's okay. I do not see the evidence, and I'm suspicious of the whole thing.

[Utah Girl]

I'm going to bed right now, let me sleep on my answer back to you.

[nopardons]

" Innocent " men, women, and children get killed in wars. Does that mean that we should just roll over and play dead, instead of attacking anyone, at any time, even when, as in the 9/11 attacks, here, we have nbeen attacked ?

Would you also have been against attacking Germany,say, in 1940, when we knew what was going on there ?