[Doc Savage]

There is no "Ground Zero",......yet! These idiots in the media love to call the blasted foundation of the World Trade Centers, Ground Zero. It isn't a Ground Zero. That term is reserved for the ground area directly below the aerial detonation of a nuclear bomb, or the land detonation point of a nuclear device.

So New York is NOT Ground Zero. But there soon will be a Ground Zero in the United States, perhaps several, which will annihilate several major cities in the United States. The most likely scenario will be the land-based detonation of a "dirty" nuclear device, thereby rendering the affected city and surrounding land mass uninhabitable for thousands of years.

I can only hope that these inevitable tragedies will take the vast majority of politically-correct, bleeding heart Liberals who will bear the ultimate responsibility for the downfall of this once great nation. Let us hope that Tom "Neville Chamberlin" Daschwipe and Ground Zero are one and the same. If I have to die, I want to make damn sure that Traitor goes too!

[mvpel]

In order to "annihilate" a city, they'd have to set off a fusion bomb, not the simplistic Hiroshima-style uranium bombs that they are far more likely to have. And both Hiroshima and Nagasaki are still on the map.

[dead]

A dirty bomb would certainly not render an entire city and surrounding land mass uninhabitable for thousands of years.

It would dirty up a few blocks, depending on the size of the conventional explosive and the wind.

It would still be cause to level a few cities in the mideast though.

[johnny7]

I would bet-the-farm that DC would be their prefered target for a nuke/dirty nuke/neutron bomb.

With the idiots in the DC police, you know, the ones that can't find a dead body, anything can happen.