What we need is a good space-salvage operation. This is like finding the Titanic in space. And there are a bunch of other defunct satellites up there that could be captured as well. (I think there was a recent, serious, business proposal by someone to have a company that would capture non-functional satellites and refurbish them while in orbit. Can't remember where I saw that, though.)
1 posted on
09/12/2002 8:40:11 AM PDT by
cogitator
To: cogitator
This is rather ridiculous. Apollo 12 was a Saturn V booster, not a Saturn IV-B, and only Apollos 8-10 and 13 flew by the moon, Apollo 11 was the first landing. You'd think that this would be something that every person capable of writing a coherent English sentence would know, but I guess I'm just reveealing myself as a space wonk.
2 posted on
09/12/2002 8:47:43 AM PDT by
mvpel
To: Vic3O3
Way cool!
Semper Fi
6 posted on
09/12/2002 8:57:26 AM PDT by
dd5339
To: cogitator
J002E3 is currently observable at magnitude 16.5
"observable" is stretching it. Pluto would appear brighter then this thing.
7 posted on
09/12/2002 9:01:02 AM PDT by
JoeU.S.
To: boris
ping. Did you ever read that link I provided about Dr. Klager or do you still insist that the information I gave was somehow faulty? Don't care, just curious.
To: dighton
An analysis of the orbital motion of the newly discovered object J002E3 indicates that it could be a leftover Saturn V third stage from one of the Apollo missions, most likely the Apollo 12 mission, launched on November 14, 1969. Space Joo mystery solved?
To: cogitator; RadioAstronomer
In
this article the reporter mentions a
second natural moon, called "Cruithne".
1. We've got a second moon??? Whassup wid Dat?
2. How do you pronounce "Cruithne"?
16 posted on
09/12/2002 11:20:53 AM PDT by
jennyp
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson