To: BrianS.Wise
To the second question, one assumes Ritters new basis of knowledge comes either from the Iraqis themselves, or is simply a visceral, contrary reaction to a power he doesnt trust (that being the United States government).Man, this is where I'm lost. This morning, I was wondering how much closer to a line of treason he was willing to step. Do you have any idea? I mean, the guy talks to the Daquiri's! It seems he isn't going to backdown from continuing to bitch about the US approach of eradicating Saddam.
Well written essay. Keep it up.
To: daniel boob
Again, it's not the lack of support that bothers me, it's that it seems so groundless, the way he lays it out. Opposition is fine, but he shouldn't be surprised so many people are concerned about his line of reasoning.
To: daniel boob; MEGoody; N. Theknow; MrB; hosepipe; esopman; carton253; Stultis; freethinkingman; ...
Hey you guys -
I was stunned to log on this afternoon and see this posting was still blowing up. You guys are the best; what a great series of exchanges. I would like to encourage all of you to join my mailing list, as I'd very much like to keep all of you as steady readers. This especially includes palmer, who is my new best friend. (
tgolist@attbi.com)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson