[elfman2]

"… the ratio of left-wing to conservative professors in a number of universities…. And some people think the problem is in Iraq? "

The author's meatheads are dishonest. Any one of us could come up with a list of a dozen or more social problems that we could say must be solved before attacking Iraq, or doing anything else.

[meenie]

Anybody that ignores the potential enemies here at home is going to be very surprised. Just imagine the inequality of persons trying to get some CIA operatives into Iraq to get Sadaam. Now visualize the terrorists trying to get a team into the United States with our present border policies. The United States is the safest haven for a terrorist in the world today.

If he is setting in a camp in Timbuktu he can be wiped out by an aerial attack with smart weapons. In the United States, he can melt into the population and survive indefinitely until he has a chance to strike. Now tell me, if this isn't logical, what is wrong with this theory? If not, do you think that the terrorist is too stupid to figure this angle out?