Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cultural Jihad
It's immaterial to the point, CJ.
The 'Prohibition' of property is unconstitutional, whether local, state, or federal.
582 posted on 09/17/2002 8:10:57 PM PDT by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 580 | View Replies ]


To: tpaine
It's immaterial to the point, CJ.

Not at all. You were the one who wrongly characterised simple marijuana possession as a 'felony.' In point of fact it is not a felony in California nor an arrestable offense, but a misdemeanor subject to a hundred dollar fine.

583 posted on 09/17/2002 8:15:43 PM PDT by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 582 | View Replies ]

To: tpaine
The 'Prohibition' of property is unconstitutional, whether local, state, or federal.


That famous melodious group "Banned in Boston"
played live before the Continental Congress
[Intaglio etching courtesy of LP Historical Revisionism, Inc]

584 posted on 09/17/2002 8:19:33 PM PDT by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 582 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson