To: Cultural Jihad
It's immaterial to the point, CJ.
The 'Prohibition' of property is unconstitutional, whether local, state, or federal.
582 posted on
09/17/2002 8:10:57 PM PDT by
tpaine
To: tpaine
It's immaterial to the point, CJ. Not at all. You were the one who wrongly characterised simple marijuana possession as a 'felony.' In point of fact it is not a felony in California nor an arrestable offense, but a misdemeanor subject to a hundred dollar fine.
To: tpaine
The 'Prohibition' of property is unconstitutional, whether local, state, or federal.
That famous melodious group "Banned in Boston"
played live before the Continental Congress
[Intaglio etching courtesy of LP Historical Revisionism, Inc]
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson