Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Fitzcarraldo
Gee we went from "we don't need no steenkin' nexus" between Iraq and 911 to having Atta the nobody meeting personally with the Saddam himself?

This is bull$h!t. If it were so they would have been milking it in public for all it's worth. Just a few days ago when they were contending that there hadn't been any other big shoes dropping and none were really needed to justify an invasion.

25 posted on 09/08/2002 8:36:43 AM PDT by AAABEST
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: AAABEST
This is bull$h!t. If it were so they would have been milking it in public for all it's worth.

The leftists attempt to prevent us from protecting our citizens is whats bull$h!t.

27 posted on 09/08/2002 8:39:11 AM PDT by Rome2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: AAABEST
If it were so they would have been milking it in public for all it's worth.

Agreed. Watching for Perle's denial. I think our "friends" in Europe with the Iraqi economic interests are making up stories that will be discredited.

By the way, I think the best time to invade Iraq would have been 9-12-2001.

29 posted on 09/08/2002 8:42:27 AM PDT by Fitzcarraldo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: AAABEST
"This is bull$h!t. If it were so they would have been milking it in public for all it's worth."

No, up to now we need misdirection more than more public support. A few months ago the world community, perhaps even Saddam, was not convinced that we were committed to invasion.

We have the legal authority to invade right now. And we still have a narrow majority of public support.

We weren't ready to invade until now, needing satellite guided weapons replenishment, Afghan wrap up, special training, forward deployments of equipment, airstrip construction, vaccine restocking and the fall climate change. But we didn't want to over-forecast our intentions, certainly not almost a year in advance. One year of firm notice would have given Saddam more time to commit to more elaborate counter attacks, justifying them by our overt threats, and would have allowed international opposition time to ferment, more so than now.

At some point we will need to shift over and trade operational ambiguity for public support. Perhaps that time is now, to coincide with the 9/11 memorials.

41 posted on 09/08/2002 9:17:37 AM PDT by elfman2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: AAABEST
This is bull$h!t. If it were so they would have been milking it in public for all it's worth.

Stupid Dubya strikes again!
He let the Democrats blather for a couple of weeks...during this week (including
the speech to the UN on Thursday), he'll roll out all the smoking guns, connect the dots,
and support to splat Sadaam will gain momentum.

I just pray the Democrats keep on underestimating Dubya.
49 posted on 09/08/2002 10:14:47 AM PDT by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson