Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dakmar
Let me see if I can reconcile that belief system.

A murdering scum bag has lived a life rich with experience and duration, therefore deserving of respect for its fullness. Such a life, no matter how vile, evil or detrimental to those in the society at large, has reached a stage of completeness that is beyond mere judgement by his/her peers.

Now, the innocent unborn, in the alternative, knows nothing of life in its durance, nothing of life derived by meaningful sensation and is truely a tabula rosa (blank slate) which, if tossed aside, will only be a blank slate decaying in some organic compost. Indeed, we see that the poor distraught mother is really in the same state of grace as the murderous scumbag in the paragraph supra. Ergo, her life could be altered in some cosmic manner unbefitting her choice of lifestyle if the spark of life in her womb were allowed to gestate. We see, then, that mercy for the life experiences of the murderous scum and the aborting non-mother are sacrosanct and trump any negative judgement.

Thank-you.

(whuuuuuuuuuuf, whellllaarrrrrrrp, puuuuuuuuuuuuuke...)

36 posted on 09/07/2002 10:35:27 PM PDT by Thommas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: Thommas
Liberals confuse me.

Death for the inosent. (unborn)
Life for the guilty. (killers)

How any person could maintain this delusional view is beyond me.

58 posted on 09/08/2002 7:42:45 AM PDT by ChadGore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson