Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jimtorr
This is such a ticky-tac thing! The question must be asked, who did Bradford offend?

I think it goes back farther than that. The question should be: who did Aguirre offend?

It started with the chief's letter of reprimand to Aguirre for "using profane and threatening language toward his subordinates". From the article:

Aguirre called supervisors in the South Central patrol division, which he oversees, "sons of bitches" and "lazy bastards,"

Reading between the lines, it appears that Aguirre appealed to the Civil Service Commission, using the "everyone does it" defense. Bradford was probably asked if "he ever used profanity" in that context.

Since he didn't use the classic Clintonism ("I don't recall"), he really had no defense when contradicted by his own subordinates. So, Bradford was hoisted on his own petard.

12 posted on 09/07/2002 5:57:53 AM PDT by justlurking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: jimtorr
So, Bradford was hoisted on his own petard.

While this is a common form of the metaphor, I realized it's not grammatically correct. It should be "hoist(ed) by one's own petard". as originally quoted from Shakespeare's "Hamlet".

29 posted on 09/07/2002 9:45:53 AM PDT by justlurking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson