To: WyldKard
Sorry, but I still see an all-or-nothing approach as doing more harm than good.
We've got tons of problems, and we have to figure out which we have to solve first. In my opinion, winning this war has to be priority one. Second is judicial nominations. Third, tax cuts. Fourth, start rolling back some gun control laws.
On the other issues, I'll accept compromises, and we'll fix those later, when we've solved the big problems.
17 posted on
09/06/2002 10:10:31 AM PDT by
hchutch
To: hchutch
In my opinion, winning this war has to be priority one. What war? The war on drugs, the war on terrorism, the war against Iraq, the war against the liberty and freedoms of the american people.
If this president really thinks he is at war, the first thing he would do is close the borders to eliminate illegals from entering the country. The next thing he would do would be to round up all illegals and deport them. Then he would get rid of undesireable immigrants. Then he would develope a civilian defense policy. He has done none of these things. Why, you ask, because there is no war.
22 posted on
09/06/2002 10:25:18 AM PDT by
gunshy
To: hchutch
On the other issues, I'll accept compromises, and we'll fix those later, when we've solved the big problems. The problem with your so-called solution of compromise is that you never quite to develop the will to actually change anything..it's all maybe and might followed by well maybe tomorrow. Clue me into what this establishes other than the status quo?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson